Thats what I thought. I'm moving towards getting a 256e for stage 2 of my 200e (I'm only 1/2 filling a cabinet to start with). Creating complex modulations from feeding the output of 1 of the 256e sections into another sounds like it could have lots. On 20 Nov 2005, at 17:56, Peter Grenader wrote: > Shit - i meant a 256. my bad. the 255 is fine, but i wouldn't ever > need 8 > slews. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [200e] Thoughts on the 260e
2005-11-20 by Stewart Moroney