I love the 285e. Very accurate and clean. Btw , I would never describe it as "subtle" ... i wonder if yours is functioning properly amnesia ....
i think the ring mod section sounds good , but not nearly as good as the 111
which is my favorite ring mod of all time. But what it lacks in sonic quality is more
than made up for by the flexibility :)
--- On Tue, 1/5/10, dougc356 <dougc356@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: dougc356 <dougc356@yahoo.com>
Subject: [200e] Re: 285e Freq shifter
To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2010, 4:37 PM
It's also a nice alternative to the internal AM modulation of the 259e and 261e. More pronounced effect, I think.
Doug
--- In 200e@yahoogroups. com, Chris Muir <cbm@...> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 5, 2010, at 1:37 AM, amnesia wrote:
>
> > I have had one for a while now and like it but its really subtle
>
>
> While it _can_ do some subtile shifts, subtile would not be my go-to
> description for this module.
>
> It goes from nothing to full on klang pretty quickly.
>
> - C
>
> Chris Muir
> cbm@...
> http://www.xfade. com
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [200e] Re: 285e Freq shifter
2010-01-05 by joe Pascarell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.