Some incredibly useful units in the ModuleModule series, Chris - what an inspired idea! > After letting the real world get in the way for a while, I've made > some time to slave away over a hot drafting table, and I think that > these designs are finally far enough along to pull back the curtain. > OK, so I don't really use a drafting table, but you get the idea. I > have two main projects well underway, the ModuleModule, and Periodicity. > > ModuleModule - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/ModuleModule/ > The ModuleModule is my solution to the problem that I encountered in > trying to design the perfect utility module. I initially thought that > I could find _just_ the right balance of things to make a utility > module or two, but I could never quite settle on just the right things > to include. Then it hit me that the problem was overly constrained. I > was never going to be able to make a universally useful utility > module, because there are just too many problems that different people > might have. > > The ModuleModule lets you put together up to four utility functions of > your choosing in one module. I have many ModuleModule modules planned, > more than are listed on the page. Given that I'm a tiny shop, all the > ModuleModule modules won't be available right away, and reaction to > individual ModuleModule modules will determine the order in which I > tackle those sub-projects. I also hope that third parties will produce > modules in this format. > > Periodicity - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/Periodicity/ > While the 259e and 261e waveform generators have modulation > oscillators which can operate as LFOs, there aren't really any > dedicated LFOs in the Buchla system. My problem with using the mod > oscillators as LFOs is that I almost _always_ want to use them for > audio-rate modulation. The 281e function generator can also be pressed > into service as an LFO, but I still felt the need for a dedicated LFO > in my system. Also neither the mod oscillator nor the function > generator goes slow enough for my tastes. > > The Periodicity module is a feature-rich triple LFO that, among a host > of other features, can go really slow. There are still a few issues > that I'm working on: the LFO stew section is not 100% firm, and there > are still open questions regarding exactly what aspects of LFO 2 & 3 > are slaved, when slave is enabled. (Symmetry? Freeze?) > > --- > > Both the ModuleModule and Periodicity are pretty far along, but I > haven't moved into the layout/parts procurement/assembly phases, so > all of these are still a few months away. I'm not taking deposits as I > haven't firmed up pricing yet. That said, I would like to get some > idea about the interest for these two ideas, and particularly what > ModuleModule modules you might be interested in. > > Richard Lainhart http://www.otownmedia.com http://www.downloadplatform.com/richard_lainhart http://www.vimeo.com/rlainhart http://www.youtube.com/rlainhart http://richardlainhart.bandcamp.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [200e] Eardrill future modules
2010-01-25 by Richard Lainhart
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.