Yahoo Groups archive

200e

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:38 UTC

Thread

Eardrill future modules

Eardrill future modules

2010-01-25 by Chris Muir

After letting the real world get in the way for a while, I've made  
some time to slave away over a hot drafting table, and I think that  
these designs are finally far enough along to pull back the curtain.  
OK, so I don't really use a drafting table, but you get the idea. I  
have two main projects well underway, the ModuleModule, and Periodicity.

ModuleModule - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/ModuleModule/
The ModuleModule is my solution to the problem that I encountered in  
trying to design the perfect utility module. I initially thought that  
I could find _just_ the right balance of things to make a utility  
module or two, but I could never quite settle on just the right things  
to include. Then it hit me that the problem was overly constrained. I  
was never going to be able to make a universally useful utility  
module, because there are just too many problems that different people  
might have.

The ModuleModule lets you put together up to four utility functions of  
your choosing in one module. I have many ModuleModule modules planned,  
more than are listed on the page. Given that I'm a tiny shop, all the  
ModuleModule modules won't be available right away, and reaction to  
individual ModuleModule modules will determine the order in which I  
tackle those sub-projects. I also hope that third parties will produce  
modules in this format.

Periodicity - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/Periodicity/
While the 259e and 261e waveform generators have modulation  
oscillators which can operate as LFOs, there aren't really any  
dedicated LFOs in the Buchla system. My problem with using the mod  
oscillators as LFOs is that I almost _always_ want to use them for  
audio-rate modulation. The 281e function generator can also be pressed  
into service as an LFO, but I still felt the need for a dedicated LFO  
in my system. Also neither the mod oscillator nor the function  
generator goes slow enough for my tastes.

The Periodicity module is a feature-rich triple LFO that, among a host  
of other features, can go really slow. There are still a few issues  
that I'm working on: the LFO stew section is not 100% firm, and there  
are still open questions regarding exactly what aspects of LFO 2 & 3  
are slaved, when slave is enabled. (Symmetry? Freeze?)

---

Both the ModuleModule and Periodicity are pretty far along, but I  
haven't moved into the layout/parts procurement/assembly phases, so  
all of these are still a few months away. I'm not taking deposits as I  
haven't firmed up pricing yet. That said, I would like to get some  
idea about the interest for these two ideas, and particularly what  
ModuleModule modules you might be interested in.

Re: [200e] Eardrill future modules

2010-01-25 by Jason Butcher

Some very interesting ideas here, Chris!




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Chris Muir <cbm@well.com>
To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, January 25, 2010 2:22:43 PM
Subject: [200e] Eardrill future modules

  
After letting the real world get in the way for a while, I've made 
some time to slave away over a hot drafting table, and I think that 
these designs are finally far enough along to pull back the curtain. 
OK, so I don't really use a drafting table, but you get the idea. I 
have two main projects well underway, the ModuleModule, and Periodicity.

ModuleModule - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/ModuleModule/
The ModuleModule is my solution to the problem that I encountered in 
trying to design the perfect utility module. I initially thought that 
I could find _just_ the right balance of things to make a utility 
module or two, but I could never quite settle on just the right things 
to include. Then it hit me that the problem was overly constrained. I 
was never going to be able to make a universally useful utility 
module, because there are just too many problems that different people 
might have.

The ModuleModule lets you put together up to four utility functions of 
your choosing in one module. I have many ModuleModule modules planned, 
more than are listed on the page. Given that I'm a tiny shop, all the 
ModuleModule modules won't be available right away, and reaction to 
individual ModuleModule modules will determine the order in which I 
tackle those sub-projects. I also hope that third parties will produce 
modules in this format.

Periodicity - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/Periodicity/
While the 259e and 261e waveform generators have modulation 
oscillators which can operate as LFOs, there aren't really any 
dedicated LFOs in the Buchla system. My problem with using the mod 
oscillators as LFOs is that I almost _always_ want to use them for 
audio-rate modulation. The 281e function generator can also be pressed 
into service as an LFO, but I still felt the need for a dedicated LFO 
in my system. Also neither the mod oscillator nor the function 
generator goes slow enough for my tastes.

The Periodicity module is a feature-rich triple LFO that, among a host 
of other features, can go really slow. There are still a few issues 
that I'm working on: the LFO stew section is not 100% firm, and there 
are still open questions regarding exactly what aspects of LFO 2 & 3 
are slaved, when slave is enabled. (Symmetry? Freeze?)

---

Both the ModuleModule and Periodicity are pretty far along, but I 
haven't moved into the layout/parts procurement/ assembly phases, so 
all of these are still a few months away. I'm not taking deposits as I 
haven't firmed up pricing yet. That said, I would like to get some 
idea about the interest for these two ideas, and particularly what 
ModuleModule modules you might be interested in.


 


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [200e] Eardrill future modules

2010-01-25 by Richard Lainhart

Some incredibly useful units in the ModuleModule series, Chris - what an inspired idea!


> After letting the real world get in the way for a while, I've made 
> some time to slave away over a hot drafting table, and I think that 
> these designs are finally far enough along to pull back the curtain. 
> OK, so I don't really use a drafting table, but you get the idea. I 
> have two main projects well underway, the ModuleModule, and Periodicity.
> 
> ModuleModule - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/ModuleModule/
> The ModuleModule is my solution to the problem that I encountered in 
> trying to design the perfect utility module. I initially thought that 
> I could find _just_ the right balance of things to make a utility 
> module or two, but I could never quite settle on just the right things 
> to include. Then it hit me that the problem was overly constrained. I 
> was never going to be able to make a universally useful utility 
> module, because there are just too many problems that different people 
> might have.
> 
> The ModuleModule lets you put together up to four utility functions of 
> your choosing in one module. I have many ModuleModule modules planned, 
> more than are listed on the page. Given that I'm a tiny shop, all the 
> ModuleModule modules won't be available right away, and reaction to 
> individual ModuleModule modules will determine the order in which I 
> tackle those sub-projects. I also hope that third parties will produce 
> modules in this format.
> 
> Periodicity - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/Periodicity/
> While the 259e and 261e waveform generators have modulation 
> oscillators which can operate as LFOs, there aren't really any 
> dedicated LFOs in the Buchla system. My problem with using the mod 
> oscillators as LFOs is that I almost _always_ want to use them for 
> audio-rate modulation. The 281e function generator can also be pressed 
> into service as an LFO, but I still felt the need for a dedicated LFO 
> in my system. Also neither the mod oscillator nor the function 
> generator goes slow enough for my tastes.
> 
> The Periodicity module is a feature-rich triple LFO that, among a host 
> of other features, can go really slow. There are still a few issues 
> that I'm working on: the LFO stew section is not 100% firm, and there 
> are still open questions regarding exactly what aspects of LFO 2 & 3 
> are slaved, when slave is enabled. (Symmetry? Freeze?)
> 
> ---
> 
> Both the ModuleModule and Periodicity are pretty far along, but I 
> haven't moved into the layout/parts procurement/assembly phases, so 
> all of these are still a few months away. I'm not taking deposits as I 
> haven't firmed up pricing yet. That said, I would like to get some 
> idea about the interest for these two ideas, and particularly what 
> ModuleModule modules you might be interested in.
> 
> 




Richard Lainhart
http://www.otownmedia.com
http://www.downloadplatform.com/richard_lainhart
http://www.vimeo.com/rlainhart
http://www.youtube.com/rlainhart
http://richardlainhart.bandcamp.com/






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [200e] Eardrill future modules

2010-01-25 by joe Pascarell

Fantastic work Chris! Put me down for 1 periodicity module and one module module containing: atten , v. accum , pulse balloons , vca.   Btw , i LOVE the Pendulum Ratchet

all the best
Joe

--- On Mon, 1/25/10, Chris Muir <cbm@well.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Chris Muir <cbm@well.com>
Subject: [200e] Eardrill future modules
To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, January 25, 2010, 2:22 PM







 



  


    
      
      
      After letting the real world get in the way for a while, I've made  

some time to slave away over a hot drafting table, and I think that  

these designs are finally far enough along to pull back the curtain.  

OK, so I don't really use a drafting table, but you get the idea. I  

have two main projects well underway, the ModuleModule, and Periodicity.



ModuleModule - http://www.eardrill .com/modules/ ModuleModule/

The ModuleModule is my solution to the problem that I encountered in  

trying to design the perfect utility module. I initially thought that  

I could find _just_ the right balance of things to make a utility  

module or two, but I could never quite settle on just the right things  

to include. Then it hit me that the problem was overly constrained. I  

was never going to be able to make a universally useful utility  

module, because there are just too many problems that different people  

might have.



The ModuleModule lets you put together up to four utility functions of  

your choosing in one module. I have many ModuleModule modules planned,  

more than are listed on the page. Given that I'm a tiny shop, all the  

ModuleModule modules won't be available right away, and reaction to  

individual ModuleModule modules will determine the order in which I  

tackle those sub-projects. I also hope that third parties will produce  

modules in this format.



Periodicity - http://www.eardrill .com/modules/ Periodicity/

While the 259e and 261e waveform generators have modulation  

oscillators which can operate as LFOs, there aren't really any  

dedicated LFOs in the Buchla system. My problem with using the mod  

oscillators as LFOs is that I almost _always_ want to use them for  

audio-rate modulation. The 281e function generator can also be pressed  

into service as an LFO, but I still felt the need for a dedicated LFO  

in my system. Also neither the mod oscillator nor the function  

generator goes slow enough for my tastes.



The Periodicity module is a feature-rich triple LFO that, among a host  

of other features, can go really slow. There are still a few issues  

that I'm working on: the LFO stew section is not 100% firm, and there  

are still open questions regarding exactly what aspects of LFO 2 & 3  

are slaved, when slave is enabled. (Symmetry? Freeze?)



---



Both the ModuleModule and Periodicity are pretty far along, but I  

haven't moved into the layout/parts procurement/ assembly phases, so  

all of these are still a few months away. I'm not taking deposits as I  

haven't firmed up pricing yet. That said, I would like to get some  

idea about the interest for these two ideas, and particularly what  

ModuleModule modules you might be interested in.





    
     

    
    


 



  






      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [200e] Eardrill future modules

2010-01-26 by JB

Interesting concept Chris!

2010/1/25 Chris Muir <cbm@well.com>:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> After letting the real world get in the way for a while, I've made
> some time to slave away over a hot drafting table, and I think that
> these designs are finally far enough along to pull back the curtain.
> OK, so I don't really use a drafting table, but you get the idea. I
> have two main projects well underway, the ModuleModule, and Periodicity.
>
> ModuleModule - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/ModuleModule/
> The ModuleModule is my solution to the problem that I encountered in
> trying to design the perfect utility module. I initially thought that
> I could find _just_ the right balance of things to make a utility
> module or two, but I could never quite settle on just the right things
> to include. Then it hit me that the problem was overly constrained. I
> was never going to be able to make a universally useful utility
> module, because there are just too many problems that different people
> might have.
>
> The ModuleModule lets you put together up to four utility functions of
> your choosing in one module. I have many ModuleModule modules planned,
> more than are listed on the page. Given that I'm a tiny shop, all the
> ModuleModule modules won't be available right away, and reaction to
> individual ModuleModule modules will determine the order in which I
> tackle those sub-projects. I also hope that third parties will produce
> modules in this format.
>
> Periodicity - http://www.eardrill.com/modules/Periodicity/
> While the 259e and 261e waveform generators have modulation
> oscillators which can operate as LFOs, there aren't really any
> dedicated LFOs in the Buchla system. My problem with using the mod
> oscillators as LFOs is that I almost _always_ want to use them for
> audio-rate modulation. The 281e function generator can also be pressed
> into service as an LFO, but I still felt the need for a dedicated LFO
> in my system. Also neither the mod oscillator nor the function
> generator goes slow enough for my tastes.
>
> The Periodicity module is a feature-rich triple LFO that, among a host
> of other features, can go really slow. There are still a few issues
> that I'm working on: the LFO stew section is not 100% firm, and there
> are still open questions regarding exactly what aspects of LFO 2 & 3
> are slaved, when slave is enabled. (Symmetry? Freeze?)
>
> ---
>
> Both the ModuleModule and Periodicity are pretty far along, but I
> haven't moved into the layout/parts procurement/assembly phases, so
> all of these are still a few months away. I'm not taking deposits as I
> haven't firmed up pricing yet. That said, I would like to get some
> idea about the interest for these two ideas, and particularly what
> ModuleModule modules you might be interested in.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.