Yahoo Groups archive

200e

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:38 UTC

Message

Re: eASEL?

2010-09-09 by Giorgio Sancristoforo

sorry if I came up with this old topic but I would like to say that I'd love to see a 208 + 218 reissued in "e" fashion with a nice small portable cabinet.

I would buy it at the speed of light.

--- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, "kkonkkrete" <kkonkkrete@...> wrote:
>
> --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, Chris Muir <cbm@> wrote:
> 
> > What are the reasons people would like to see a 208e? What are the  
> > features of the original 208 that would make you want a reissue?
> > 
> > For me, they include:
> >   - immediate control of a nice little voice architecture
> >   - sliders provide fast manipulation of multiple parameters  
> > simultaneously
> >   - uncorrelated random outputs a really nice touch
> 
> Those sound like pretty good reasons to me!  I'd like a 208 re-release
> or updated equivalent because it would be (even) more portable than a
> 200e system, and because it would have MORE LIMITED functionality. 
> That's a good thing.  It is easier to have a complete grasp of the
> sonic potential with a less open-ended architecture.
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.