200e

That's really interesting Don, thanks. I have yet to acquire a 261e, it's good to know that in advance though.

I really wish I could answer your FM index query, would you believe it, today was my first 'dance' with the 200e! My moves need some work, yet :-)

But wow - the experience was incredible - just a 259e too... Really impressive! 

Thanks again Don!

Sent from my iPhone

On 18 Sep 2010, at 07:03 PM, don hassler <dlh30039@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I found the gain on the 259e being very noticeably lower than the 261e, though 
> how the complex compares to the twisted I'm not sure.
> While you have both, I'd be interested in whether the internal fm index is the 
> same on the twisted as the complex.
> I had my complex upgraded, and for some reason, I'm imagining the range of 
> internal fm to be lower on the twisted.
> Thanks!
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Rash Rahim <rashemirashim@yahoo.com>
> To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 13:57:22
> Subject: [200e] 259e: Complex vs. Twisted versions gain / volume differences
> 
> Today I had a Complex 259e and a Twisted 259e (both running v15 'Twisted' 
> firmware) going into respective inputs into the 227e. Strangely, the Complex 
> version has far less absolute volume potential than the Twisted version. 
> Suspecting 227e channel gain differences, I swapped the inputs around, but sadly 
> 
> the phenomena persisted.
> 
> I was wondering if this is a 'problem' specific to the Complex 259e that I have, 
> 
> or if it is perhaps explained by something else, for instance, for all I know, 
> B&A revised the output gain level for the Twisted re-release, can anyone 
> confirm, refute or otherwise explain what I'm experiencing here? I wonder if 
> anyone else on the list has a Complex and Twisted 259e, if so I would really 
> love to have your feedback, or from anyone else for that matter. 
> 
> Very many thanks in advance!
> 
> Rash
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]