200e

Todd, 
Thanks for your input.  I appreciate getting it from a seasoned user.  I mainly do "very disturbing noise" according to my wife,  but I think of it as a kind of sound sculpting.
                                                  Best Regards,                                                       Arthur

--- On Mon, 4/25/11, Todd Barton <vgermuse@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Todd Barton <vgermuse@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [200e] Buchla 252e and 285e
To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, April 25, 2011, 9:20 AM















 
 



  


    
      
      
      I've not heard, tried or seen the 252e but I love the 285e -- it can go from the most delicate and subtle RM and FM to the very dramatic -- it is smooth and extremely

responsive.  Of course, it depends on what style of sounds/music you want to do

whether the 252e or 285e is best for you.  You can't lose methinks.  best, Todd



--- On Sun, 4/24/11, arthur_p20012001 <arthur_p20012001@yahoo.com> wrote:



From: arthur_p20012001 <arthur_p20012001@yahoo.com>

Subject: [200e] Buchla 252e and 285e

To: 200e@yahoogroups.com

Date: Sunday, April 24, 2011, 1:54 PM



 



I am considering adding one of the above to my powered cabinet.  Does anyone have any experiences to share about the Quad Sequential Voltage Source and the Frequency Shifter/Balanced Modulator?  I'm sort of tending towards the 285e.  Thanks!



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





    
     

    
    


 



  










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]