200e

I'm not a seasoned user yet, but the 18 rack I use has a balanced modulator on it. If you're into ring modulation than that module is the pinnacle of it. 

Jeshua

--- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, Arthur <arthur_p20012001@...> wrote:
>
> Todd, 
> Thanks for your input. Â I appreciate getting it from a seasoned user. Â I mainly do "very disturbing noise" according to my wife, Â but I think of it as a kind of sound sculpting.
>                                                   Best Regards,                                                       Arthur
> 
> --- On Mon, 4/25/11, Todd Barton <vgermuse@...> wrote:
> 
> From: Todd Barton <vgermuse@...>
> Subject: Re: [200e] Buchla 252e and 285e
> To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, April 25, 2011, 9:20 AM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
>     
>       
>       
>       I've not heard, tried or seen the 252e but I love the 285e -- it can go from the most delicate and subtle RM and FM to the very dramatic -- it is smooth and extremely
> 
> responsive.  Of course, it depends on what style of sounds/music you want to do
> 
> whether the 252e or 285e is best for you.  You can't lose methinks.  best, Todd
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Sun, 4/24/11, arthur_p20012001 <arthur_p20012001@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> From: arthur_p20012001 <arthur_p20012001@...>
> 
> Subject: [200e] Buchla 252e and 285e
> 
> To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
> 
> Date: Sunday, April 24, 2011, 1:54 PM
> 
> 
> 
> Â 
> 
> 
> 
> I am considering adding one of the above to my powered cabinet.  Does anyone have any experiences to share about the Quad Sequential Voltage Source and the Frequency Shifter/Balanced Modulator?  I'm sort of tending towards the 285e.  Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>      
> 
>     
>     
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>