200e

Hi Frank,

Generally for a six panel system that must include 250e I would
recommend: 250e, 281e, 292e, 261e and 225e. That would give you
something "traditional" that can be used on its own.
Why no filter? Well the Buchla oscillators are capable of such a wide
variety in timbre by themselves that a filter isn't as neccessary as
in systems from other manufacturers. I think the 292e is enough in
such a small system.

The 250e is great, i got mine a month ago and i love it. 225e is
essential to enable storage of parameters, since the sequencer is so
complex you'll need it. 261e probably matches the quantized CV output
of the 250e better than Plan B etc. If you have a lot of other modular
gear and wants something extra perhaps you could do without the
281/292 as many others copies these modules? 291e is a powerful module
providing functionality that no other manufacturer does in such a
small package. It definitely needs the 225e too. The last module could
be 266e, another 261e or a 297.

johan

2007/1/6, fhserge <Frank.Hettlich@gmx.net>:
> Hello experienced 200e users,
>
> I am considering buying a small 200e system filling a 200e 6: powered
> boat in the next few months.
>
> As a sequencer maniac I definitely want to have a 250e. Next
> preference would be a 261e and a 291e. A 281e and a 225e would nicely
> complement this "traditional" small system.
>
> What do you guys recommend?
>
> Btw: I have a lot of other modular gear, so I am more interested in a
> Buchla "music box" of modules with functions which are not available
> from other manufacturers (Plan B, Doepfer, Wiard, Modcan, MOTM etc).
>
> Thanks a lot in advance
>
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>