Hi Frank,
I'm going down a similar road, in my case, 2 4 boats,
250e, 250e, 261e, 259e, 281e, 291e, & 292e, hopefully
a 266e at a later point.
My intent is not to attempt to integrate this small
instrument with my other modulars, instead I want to
establish it's own voice, but subject it to the
typical digital stuff. Musically, processing seems to
provide such a broad set of possibilities, by limiting
my primary source, I hope to maintain some amount of
homogeny in my work.
I chose the Buchla over other options because it was
available, I've wanted one for about 20+ years, and
was finally able to scratch enough out for a small
system(severence pay-off, I was due...)
Most importantly, the sensibility seems to resonate
for me for some reason. Probably due to the wonderful
folks who've used their Buchlas.
I ordered mine not too long back, very anxously
waiting! I suspect the delivery times are similar to
other small, custom builders.
Good luck, you'll be happy, I'm sure.
Don
--- fhserge <Frank.Hettlich@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hello experienced 200e users,
>
> I am considering buying a small 200e system filling
> a 200e 6: powered
> boat in the next few months.
>
> As a sequencer maniac I definitely want to have a
> 250e. Next
> preference would be a 261e and a 291e. A 281e and a
> 225e would nicely
> complement this "traditional" small system.
>
> What do you guys recommend?
>
> Btw: I have a lot of other modular gear, so I am
> more interested in a
> Buchla "music box" of modules with functions which
> are not available
> from other manufacturers (Plan B, Doepfer, Wiard,
> Modcan, MOTM etc).
>
> Thanks a lot in advance
>
> Frank
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com