200e

in general, you may want to consider dialing down the modulation index at
the input, when controlling pitch, if accuracy or smoothness takes
precedence over range... it is hard to sweep 10 octaves and not notice
artifacts...

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:32 AM, joe Pascarell <buchlajoe@yahoo.com> wrote:

>   i have a similar problem when outputting a voltage
> from the 266e to control pitch . when set at a slow
> rate you can hear it stepping ... i am considering the
> 255. i have no room in my 200e cabinet , but i'm
> considering mounting it in my 100 cabinet as there are
> no bussing or memory issues with this unit.
>
> --- cuari7 <cuari7@comcast.net <cuari7%40comcast.net>> wrote:
>
> > --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com <200e%40yahoogroups.com>, "tmeade1974"
> > <tmeade1974@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Just curious...
> > > What exactly were you trying to do with the 256e
> > where the aliasing
> > got in the way?
> > > Personally, I think that the precision of the
> > scaling and ability to
> > set a breakpoint outweigh
> > > the aliasing or "stepping" issues (which I haven't
> > found to be an
> > issue at all). So I am just
> > > wondering where that caught you.
> >
> >
> > Basically, trying to manually sweep oscillator pitch
> > or filter cut off
> > in a smooth, continuous way. This is particularly
> > true of the 291e,
> > which has a pot with stepped changes in value for
> > cutoff. The
> > oscillators I can sweep with their own freq pot, but
> > only one at a time.
> > Up until now, a quick solution has been using a
> > voltage from the 255
> > and feeding it into the 291e CV jacks, but the knobs
> > in this thing are
> > minuscule!
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]