Hello, We have a design using a 3.3V 68332 micro (MC68LK332ACFC16) and we are experiencing a problem wherein on 2 boards so far, the micro stays in reset after a power up because the 32,768KHz crystal is not oscillating. I wonder if this is related to the attached message from Charles Melear concerning a mask difference between the 5V and 3.3V devices in the PLL area. Is there a know problem with the 3.3V device related to the PLL? Tim McCormcik 12/14/01 >Message sent by "Charles Melear" <rdph40@...> >to the 683xx Mailing List. >Tim, >I think that there may be a small tweek to the PLL but that is all. >Charlie >tmccormick@... wrote: > > Message sent by tmccormick@... > to the 683xx Mailing List. > > Follow up question: > > Is the 3.3V device MC68LK332ACFC16 the same die also? > > Tim McCormick > > > "Charles Melear" > <rdph40@...> To: 683xx@... > Sent by: cc: > owner-683xx@oakhill-csic.s Subject: Re: 25 MHz 68332 any diff? > ps.mot.com > > > 12/12/01 04:58 PM > Please respond to 683xx > > > > Message sent by "Charles Melear" <rdph40@...> > to the 683xx Mailing List. > > Scott, > > You are the man. You have all the bases covered with regard to using the > High Stability > Filter and all. > > Bye the bye, the 16, 20 and 25 MHz devices all come from the same die. > There is NO - NADA > - NYET difference between the devices. > > Here are two ideas. First, does the oscillator fail to start? This would > be indicated by > the part never releasing reset and limp mode frequency (about 1.8 MHz) on > Clockout. The > cure is to reduce the value of the series resistor on the crystal (the 330 > Kohm) until you > see an 8 MHz signal on clock out about 200 to 400 milliseconds after power > is turned on. > It is really hard to probe the crystal pins to see when the oscillator is > starting because > the scope probe really loads those crystal pins. Look at Clockout instead. > > Second, if you are changing the frequency to anything above 8 MHz, it is > IMPERATIVE (like > you MUST DO THIS) that the X bit in the SYNCR register be set to a logic 1. > There is just > no other alternative - well, there is none that will work. > > See where this gets you and post another message if this doesn't work. > > Regards, > > Charlie
Message
Re: [68300] 3 volt 68332?
2002-06-20 by tmccormick@parker.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.