I just wanted to add, to dispel any "myths" in past discussion, the AN200 really IS a PLG150AN in a box. I was bored the other night, so I took the bottom off, and there it was - the PLG150AN card mounted nicely right under the cover. It's identical to the PLG card I have. I wasn't daring enough to detach it and plug it into my CS6x, but it would definitely work. Your assessment does seem correct, the units are identical with the exception of morph/scene control and the factory "sounds" and sequences. I prefer the knobby interface of the AN200, FAR easier to edit and create, without having to use a computer, or deal with the limited parameters and display of the "host" synth. Mark On 1/3/03 11:56 AM, "DMANX@..." <DMANX@...> wrote: > > Hi all, > I have spent the whole day messing around with the AN/DX200 desktop synths.The > DX200 sounds much better,excellent user seq voices. The AN200 can do > everything th AN150 can do and a little more e.g krap techno drum seq, krap > effects and good varible morph/scene 1-2 control,better factory sound/user > voices,real time knob control.But the voices can be used on the an150 if > somone is prepared to up load them.The drums and effects are very basic well > not to cool.You can use up to 4 voices, by coping scene1 to 2, then create an > new voice for scene 1this is is all played back as a step sequence.Then on top > of that you can play normally via a another selected voice on your midi > keyboard.....cool. > > However,My conclusion is that, the drums and effects are not worth it,its just > a cheep techno groove box for DJ'S,but the morph/scene control is good.If you > use an150 with reaktor drums/seq+VST effects you get better standard and > quality.It just lacks scene control and better morphing?And access to AN200 > sound banks? > > I would like to here from anyone else whom have tested this units. > Regards Dmanx > > >
Message
Re: [AN1x] an200 v's an150 test
2003-01-04 by Mark Pipher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.