AVR-Chat

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Don Kinzer" <dkinzer@...> wrote:
>
> --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Bruce Parham" <obparham@> wrote:
> > Is this a bug or should I keep reading?
> I don't see that in my copy.  Perhaps I edited it but I don't recall 
> doing so.
> 
> The definitions for the vectors of the second UART are contained in 
> the "else" part of a conditional where the initial test is for the 
> mega644 (non-P version).  Consequently, they will be present when 
> compiling for the mega324P and mega644P.
> 
> #if defined(__AVR_ATmega644__)
> 
> # define _VECTORS_SIZE 112
> 
> #else /* !defined(__AVR_ATmega644__) */
> 
> /* USART1, Rx Complete */
> /* USART1 RX complete */
> #define USART1_RX_vect			_VECTOR(28)
> #define SIG_USART1_RECV			_VECTOR(28)
> 
> /* USART1 Data register Empty */
> /* USART1 Data Register Empty */
> #define USART1_UDRE_vect		_VECTOR(29)
> #define SIG_USART1_DATA			_VECTOR(29)
> 
> /* USART1, Tx Complete */
> /* USART1 TX complete */
> #define USART1_TX_vect			_VECTOR(30)
> #define SIG_USART1_TRANS		_VECTOR(30)
> 
> # define _VECTORS_SIZE 124
> 
> #endif /* defined(__AVR_ATmega644__) */
> 
> Don Kinzer
> ZBasic Microcontrollers
> http://www.zbasic.net
>
Don,

Oops, my bad! No P - and, sure enough, the '644 only has one.
Guess I need ro read with more care.

I've been away from AVR's for three or four years. The last 
project I did used a '128 with the Imagecraft compiler so I 
have a lot of catchup ground to cover...

Thanks.

Bruce