On Jan 15, 2009, at 10:47 AM, David VanHorn wrote: >> It thought it sounded like a homework assignment. Therefore one is >> free >> to stipulate conditions that are not specified. > > Yeah, it kinda does sound like homework.. > > Asking for ideas is cool IMHO, he's not asking for us to SOLVE it for > him, provide tested code, and assembled PCBs with complete BOM and > programmed micros... :) Ditto. Big difference in asking for ideas. Much the same as a group discussion about a book from assigned reading vs. asking for a pre- written book report. I have spent some time considering ultrasonic range finding as a means of measuring wheel travel on a dirtbike. Optical encoders are a possibility but we're talking about measurements under very nasty conditions. Measure the travel of *this* wheel: http://home.hiwaay.net/~dkelly/Husaberg/Pages/4.html String and pulleys would be fairly complicated but easy to understand. Complex to install, especially when its not intended to be a permanent installation. What I'm thinking would work best would be a pair of telescoping tubes with piezo exciter and microphone. Then either time how long the wavefront takes to echo off the end or excite with white noise and measure the frequency. The same telescoping tubes should work just as well for the front forks. Think an accelerometer on the wheel and on the fender would also be good to have. Not sure that the job could be done with only an accelerometer but having both acceleration data and absolute position data one could validate each with the other. Then learn how to live with only one or the other for future use. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Liquid level measurement
2009-01-15 by David Kelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.