The way that Atmel might feel about their CPU being used in an FPGA device does relate to IP; so I think 'way, way off-topic' might be overstating your case. My personal opinion is that making money from royalties is problematic. I appreciate that this view might upset people who earn their living this way. As the open-source software model proves, it is possible to make money from the creation of a free product - where people offer and market their services (i.e. their time) to earn a living. I'm sure this model can - and will - be adapted for other markets. If you'd like to continue this discussion without polluting the board, feel free to email me privately. Luke On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 16:57 +0000, ecros_technology wrote: > > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Luke Whitmore <lwhitmore@...> wrote: > > > ... If something takes a certain > > amount of time to create, the > > author should be paid for the > > service rendered - not for coming > > up with the idea first. > > That's completely wrong-headed, but since it's way, way off-topic, I > invite you to do a bit of research yourself to figure out why every > country in the world offers strong incentives for people and > corporations to come up with new products and processes. > > Graham. > > > > >
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: AVR8 virtual processor on FPGA - Hack a Day
2009-11-20 by Luke Whitmore
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.