I'm taking an FPGA class right now and as a project, I'm working on an application that's now done with discrete logic. The logic needs to measure pulses with 10ns resolution. You can't do that with a micro so its being done in a combination of hardware and the micro. Putting the timer on FPGA makes sense. With a micro core in the FPGA, you could do it all on one part. On Nov 20, 2009, at 4:58 AM, Luke Whitmore wrote: > This is pretty interesting. I suppose intellectual property law is > bound to rear it's ugly head when FPGAs are considered. I wonder if > there's an open-source movement producing designs in the commons for > FPGA devices? AFAIK, Atmel have always been very good to the > open-source community - how can they adapt once FPGA use becomes more > ubiquitous? > > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 12:28 +0000, Tim Mitchell wrote: >> >> ----Original Message---- >> From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com >> [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of >> enkitec@gmail.com Sent: 20 November 2009 12:21 To: >> undisclosed-recipients Subject: [AVR-Chat] AVR8 virtual >> processor on FPGA - Hack a Day >> >>> http://hackaday.com/2009/11/19/avr8-virtual-processor-on-fpga/ >>> >> >> Interesting, I wonder what Atmel think about that. >> >> -- >> Tim Mitchell >> >> >> >> > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] AVR8 virtual processor on FPGA - Hack a Day
2009-11-22 by Philippe Habib
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.