The hardware is not the only selection criteria, the required development tools, experience with the devices and already designed modules that can be used and intefaced quickly should also be classed as part of the expense. Time is "expensive" also. Regards --- On Mon, 21/12/09, David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> wrote: From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] magazine To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, 21 December, 2009, 15:18 On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:06:41PM -0000, leon Heller wrote: > > Designers select a chip which gets the job done as cheaply and easily > as possible. In some situations it might be an AVR, in another it > might be PIC, or something else. Only *good* designers do that. Others have chip/vendor religion. When one is not willing to use any tool other than a hammer, all problems look like nails. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY. net ============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ====== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] magazine
2009-12-21 by STEVEN HOLDER
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.