On Jan 31, 2011, at 1:09 AM, Tim Mitchell wrote: > ----Original Message---- > From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Clark Martin > Sent: 30 January 2011 22:49 To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] ATMEGA64L, ATMEGA64 > > > I'd avoid doing it at all if possible. It might work > > today, it might work tomorrow but it might not the next > > day. Temperature is one variable that might affect it's > > working, if it gets too hot or too cold it might stop > > working. Also it might work, or at least seem to but you > > might be getting errors that throw off the circuit's > > operation without causing it to fail altogether. > > > > You may be right, but this was not my experience, and I hammered the devices in all sorts of conditions (not knowing about the 8Mhz limitation until I came across a couple that didn't work properly) - if they worked at all at 16Mhz then they were pretty solid. The 8MHz-only ones either would not start up, or locked up after running for a couple of seconds. > It's always possible what you had were 16 or 20 MHz chips marked as 8MHz by Atmel. It's a common practice, especially later in the production life when the yield on higher speed parts is up. > > Clark Martin Redwood City, CA, USA Macintosh / Internet Consulting "I'm a designated driver on the Information Super Highway" [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] ATMEGA64L, ATMEGA64
2011-01-31 by Clark Martin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.