On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:28 PM, John Samperi <samperi@ampertronics.com.au> wrote: > At 10:54 AM 4/07/2011, you wrote: >>Why not touch Studio 5 yet? > > Far too many bugs still, maybe ok in a year or so. > ..and then there is the 600+MB download with about 1.2GB > worth of stuff. > > If however one doesn't need reliable tools like Studio > ie a hobbyist then it may be OK, but I personally don't > want to battle with tools when I need to make some money > to pay my bills. :-) I have never really used AVR Studio 4 (not an active AVR user, more a PIC/ARM user). But we are now using AVR Studio 5 with AVR UC3 (AVR32) for our the libusbk (next generation libusb-win32) project testing and it works quite okay (other than high speed USB ISOC transfer). The developer (Travis Robinson) likes AVR Studio 5 a lot since he is a Visual Studio user. I am the tester and I am okay with AVR Studio 5 as well. But of course this is not considered a production grade firmware. Tools used: AVR Studio 5 with built-in AVR Software Framework. AVR Dragon, sponsored by Atmel UC3-A3 Xplained, sponsored by Atmel AT90USBKEY (not yet used), sponsored by Atmel Codes: http://code.google.com/p/usb-travis/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2FBmFW%2FAVR%2FASF%2FBenchmark (Take note the LUFA based codes for AT90USB are not official code and not working yet). -- Xiaofan
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please
2011-07-07 by Xiaofan Chen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.