Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Message

Re: [AVR-Chat] Comments or thoughts required please

2011-07-07 by Xiaofan Chen

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:28 PM, John Samperi
<samperi@ampertronics.com.au> wrote:
> At 10:54 AM 4/07/2011, you wrote:
>>Why not touch Studio 5 yet?
>
> Far too many bugs still, maybe ok in a year or so.
> ..and then there is the 600+MB download with about 1.2GB
> worth of stuff.
>
> If however one doesn't need reliable tools like Studio
> ie a hobbyist then it may be OK, but I personally don't
> want to battle with tools when I need to make some money
> to pay my bills. :-)

I have never really used AVR Studio 4 (not an active AVR user,
more a PIC/ARM user). But we are now using AVR Studio 5
with AVR UC3 (AVR32) for our the libusbk (next generation libusb-win32)
project testing and it works quite okay (other than high speed
USB ISOC transfer). The developer (Travis Robinson)
likes AVR Studio 5 a lot since he is a Visual Studio
user. I am the tester and I am okay with AVR Studio 5 as well.

But of course this is not considered a production
grade firmware.

Tools used:
AVR Studio 5 with built-in AVR Software Framework.
AVR Dragon, sponsored by Atmel
UC3-A3 Xplained, sponsored by Atmel
AT90USBKEY (not yet used),  sponsored by Atmel

Codes:
http://code.google.com/p/usb-travis/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2FBmFW%2FAVR%2FASF%2FBenchmark
(Take note the LUFA based codes for AT90USB are not official code
and not working yet).

-- 
Xiaofan

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.