Don Kinzer wrote: > If while examining a particular function > or smaller code sequence it is determined > that (a) the content of ... [etc., etc.] Well, that looks good to me, but then I've been agreeing with you all along. What I'm trying to get at, though, is why people are still debating this and is there something that could be said that would do it for everyone. There are words that you use, Don, in particular "deduced", where I fill in what I think is your meaning, and thus I agree with your explanation. But, if someone looks at "deduced" and can't figure out what you mean or gets it wrong, then I can see how the job is not yet done. I am still grappling with my "definitive" description of volatile, which I hope to submit for review, but there is also work to do for which I actually hope to get paid, so it's not ready yet. Graham.
Message
Re: Volatile modifier
2012-04-18 by bayramdavies