Dave Mucha wrote: > > >>I have to disagree. You seem to be saying that everyone should be >>using basic. Basic is ok for doing simple things but I have found >>that to do even moderately complex things in basic often takes > > dialect > >>specific knowledge and a healthy dose of experimentation. And a >>number of complex things (like timing related stuff or bit > > twiddling) > >>are hard or even impossible in basic. > > > I guess you're right, it sounded like Basic was an equal to C or ASM. > > each has their strong points. The one for Basic is fast time to > learn for simple projects. > > ASM is often credited for it's tight and fast code. > > And, if I'm not mistaken, C dominates the market as it is so darn > capable. > > If you are going for a job as a programmer, you will have few offers > is you list only Basic, and many, many more if you list C. > > It sounded as if I were saying C programmers burn hours to earn more > $$$ when that was not the intent. > > I have a pretty big program in Basic, and some in Asm as Basic could > not handle what was needed. > > Dave It is said that C is quick, but I recently went head to head with a C engineer and out coded him in ASM. The only reason I did was that I write ASM like C ie I make modules in ASM, with a text block at the top of each module that says what I expect to be sent, what I destroy and what I expect to send back: *********************************************** * BLAH (Module Name) * - This Module will take 2 numbers and multiply * * Input: Arg1 in Temp, Arg2 in Temp2 * Return: Result High in Temp2, Result Low in Temp * Destroy: Temp and Temp2 * Status: Tested OK *********************************************** This way I can make my code as quick as if I was writing C using my own module routines. Regards, Kat. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- K.A.Q. Electronics Website: www.kaqelectronics.dyndns.org IM: Yahoo: PinkyDwaggy MSN: katinka@kaqelectronics.dyndns.org For Everything Electronics Phone: 0419 923 731 ---------------------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Beginner
2004-10-18 by Kathy Quinlan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.