Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Message

Re: something a bit faster

2005-02-10 by upctoys

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Maddox" <P.Maddox@s...> wrote:
> All,
> 
>   I'm currently using a MEGA16 at 16Mhz for a project, and I'm 
doing a lot
> of floating point calculations (most exponential) and its getting a 
bit
> slow, so I need something with a bit more 'umph'.
> I know its kinda off topic, but, what I'm after (I think) is 
something 16Bit
> and a minimum of 25MIPs (32 would be preffered). it also *must* 
have an
> affordable C compiler (ie <£400) and an evaluation board. Surface 
mount is
> fine (in fact preffered).
>    I figured you guys would be the best place to start asking as 
you've got
> the experience (probably), Anyone have any suggestions?
> 
> Paul
Hi All
It's good to see AVR users aren't one eyed re processors. 

I used 8051's from Cygnal (Silicon Laboratories) a while ago and was 
very surprised. They are nothing like the 8051's of old. They are 
Code compatible with the old ones but they are genuine one clock for 
one operation; not divided by 12 as they used to be. 

They do have a couple of irritating things (like a crossbar register 
that doesn't deliver what you initially expect and register/bit 
differences between the family). But speed wise they are pretty good 
for a low end processor (suggested on the site at 25 >> 100 mips) and 
from playing with them they aren't that far off.

You'll have to follow the links as the final link is too long for 
this post. (General Purpose microcontrollers)
http://www2.silabs.com

upctoys

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.