I have an Ant8 myself, and am very happy with it. 500 MHz means your max sample rate is 2 nS. This means your logic analyzer can tell you when things really happen, +- 2 nS. At 40 MHz, you get +- 25nS -- still pretty good. Sometimes, you want to insure you catch some very transient (ie short) pulses. At 40 MHz, you'll ignore anything shorter than 25 nS. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, techy fellow <techyf@y...> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thanks alot for the info. As I am into MCUs, I need an equipment to help me to test my projects. I will be getting an AVR ICD or ICD2 for PIC. But when comes to testing of circuits, I think I need something more than just ICD. > > I thought of using a logic analyzer since it is meant for digital circuits. Actually, I am about to build one appeared in Elektor magazine Feb 2003 issue. Top speed is 40 Mhz. Pale in comparison to the one sold by Rocky Logic (500 Mhz). I thought since almost all MCUs is less than 32Mhz (even for ATMega 128), a 40Mhz model should do the job. Why do we need 500 Mhz ? > > cheers, > Davis > > > Alex Gibson <alxx@a...> wrote: > techy fellow wrote: > > >Hi Guys, > > > >Can someone pls let me know whether the aforementioned is a good equipment to > >invest ? Or I should go for a typical 2 channels Oscilloscopes ? > > > >Thanks in advance for your help. > >Davis > > > > > > > > What do you need ? > > What frquency range ? > What bandwidth ? > > What are you going to use it for ? > > I usually use micros and similar boards up to 100MHz > so ended up buying two second hand scopes and a usb based logic analyser. > > The one I use most of the time a HP 54502A > dual channel 400MHz dso. > > One I use only when I need to debug something > higher than 200MHz HP54501 1GHz quad channel scope. > > Logic analyser great when debugging micros. > easy to use and easy to carry. > http://www.rockylogic.com/products/ant8.html > http://www.rockylogic.com/products/ant8spec.html > good for up to around 100MHz. > I use this a lot. Windows software only though. > Still waiting on them to release their api > so you can call it from your own software. > > What I find is it is usually easier to have equipment that doesn't need > a computer. > Hit the switch and it is up and running. > Can have hassles with usb based equipment especially if other devices > your using use > the same manufacturers device but with a different driver or different > driver version. > > Alex Gibson > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > AVR-Chat-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
Message
Re: PICO PC Based Oscilloscopes (Model: ADC200/100)
2003-11-25 by Allan Lane
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.