Don't confuse commutation with PWM used to adjust the amount of power being delivered to a coil of wire. In traditional PMDC motors mechanical switches (brushes) do the commuting so all that is needed is one PWM circuit to control power. BLDC are more complex and because commuting and PWM are co-mingled finer degrees of control is possible further increasing efficiency, hence all the exotic sounding "Space Vector Control" type drive algorithms. The simplest level of control simply switches coils on/off once per cycle varying the duration of the on period for control. Not terribly efficient, but simple. -----Original Message----- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Becker Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 11:03 AM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] R/C throttle control ? > ... In a PWMed brushless DC motor, for example, there are three "phases"... Yes, I understand that quite well. I question the terminology. Is a brushless DC motor just the frame, stator and armature? I suggest that it is not, that it isn't a brushless DC motor unless it includes the drive; until then, it is a three-phase motor with open coils, is it not? If that is correct, PWM'ing a DC brushless motor involves just two leads, the DC power to the drive; the coils are downstream from the drive and semi-insensitive to the PWM frequency - they certainly are not locked to the DC power PWM frequency, as stated. If the DC power to the drive is PWM'ed, variable power is delivered to the drive, modulating torque, thus speed, no? I am balking at the notion of fixed pulse-width, three-phase drive being called PWM. Tom Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [AVR-Chat] R/C throttle control ?
2005-09-06 by Larry Barello
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.