On Feb 7, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Michael Jones wrote: > My own gut feeling on this is that any programming language has its > pros and cons and learning to use a particular language adeptly > does take an investment of time and practice. Forth has always > looked interesting to me as well but there aren't that many people > that you can turn to when you have a problem and even fewer if it > involves the AVR. C seems to be a good mix for microcontroller > programming and there are lots of people out there to help if you > get stuck. FORTH really clicks with some people. What its exceptionally good for is creating a user-extensible monitor, command shell and macro language. Almost unbelievable what one can do in 4k bytes with FORTH. Or even 2k. Last time I seriously used FORTH was prototyping 68HC11 hardware. In spite of having a full C compiler and Nohau ICE, FORTH and a serial terminal were the right tools to develop my interface to an RTC, and demonstrate the datasheet was incomplete. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] forth
2006-02-08 by David Kelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.