stevech wrote: > I'd like to fiddle (in my avocation) with Forth (compiled or byte-code), but > I didn't see a free or dirt cheap Forth product for AVRs. > > There are a few free Forths around for AVR's. The benefits of Forth tend to dry up a bit with AVR's as you can't interactively build code in memory due to the Harvard structure. Between that and JTAG with C source level support in AVRStudio I returned to the herd & got C sickness... -- Cheers Don
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Best language for learning AVRs (was forth)
2006-02-10 by Don Ingram