Ah yes, the dual-address space. GCC (WinAVR) doesn't do well with this either. The AVR-focused C compilers have good pragmas for this. -----Original Message----- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Don Ingram Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 7:36 PM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Best language for learning AVRs (was forth) stevech wrote: > I'd like to fiddle (in my avocation) with Forth (compiled or byte-code), but > I didn't see a free or dirt cheap Forth product for AVRs. > > There are a few free Forths around for AVR's. The benefits of Forth tend to dry up a bit with AVR's as you can't interactively build code in memory due to the Harvard structure. Between that and JTAG with C source level support in AVRStudio I returned to the herd & got C sickness... -- Cheers Don Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Best language for learning AVRs (was forth)
2006-02-10 by stevech
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.