Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

Well, 

I listened to the sound clip and I'm sorry to let
everyone know that I must not know enough about
the cz series because I can't tell the difference
not even at gunpoint.

I can't tell the difference between inverted and
normal synthesis on the PD.  And I can't tell the
differnce between the cz-1, and cz-101.  But let
me give you my best guess:

first stero clip = cz-101
left channel = cz-101 inverted
right channel = cz-1
second stero clip = cz-1

how close was i?

micah


--- Cosmo <cosmo@...> wrote:
> 
> --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "M.J.B."
> <yazzofever@y...> wrote:
> > Amazing, amazing, amazing work Cosmo.
> > 
> > You are the casio man indeed!
> > 
> > So what is your conclusion based on the
> evidence.
> >  Does one (cz-1 vs. cz-101)sound "better"
> then
> > the
> > other?
> > 
> > mjb
> 
> thanx,
> but to point out the real difference I need
> wav-files (hi orbital ;-)
> 
> "THERE'S A Shuffle" to say it with F242 .-)
> 
> lets have some fun and a poll: 
> test/ test / test
> 
> check
>
http://www.cosmosynthesizer.de/download/czversuscz/AB_test.mp3
> 
> this is a stereo-file (160 kbs, 44,1 khz)
> 
> Tracklisting - you'll hear: 
> 
> 2 channels
> left only
> right only
> 2 channels
> 
> made from the horn.mp3 file (check in files)
> so guys: where's the CZ-1 / CZ-101 / CZ-101 /
> CZ-1?
> 
> REMEMBER: 
> I shuffled the files, inverted some and some
> NOT.
> The left / right sound CAN be a different
> Synth, maybe \ufffd who knows?
> 
> listen carefully @ high volume (use headphones
> if possible)
> the little "hisses" come from the original
> file/ MP3 - sorry.
> I made the test too: (walked out, got a cup of
> coffee, came back while
> my Mac was looping around)....
> 
> surprising!
> 
> Any comments welcome...
> 
> Cosmo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

y[]a[]z[]z[]o[]f[]e[]v[]e[]r[]


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/