> > It's really pretty limited for straight FM- the voice structure is > > versitile enough in theory, but when operator pairs are strictly > > limited to a modulator:carrier ratio of 2:1, it really constricts > > things. It works well enough for a 2-operator pair ring-modulated > > with another wave, but it doesn't have near the flexibility of FM > > algorithms. > >That's not completely true if you use 4 Operators you can have at least two >operators with free definable fequencies, check my tutorial... I know how that works, it's just not as nice as the algorithm structure of a DX7, which I think included most useful combinations. So yeah, I can get FM with two modulators and one carrier, or longer multi-operator chains, but it doesn't cover all of the DX7 territory. At least on the VZ though the pitch menu is much nicer... > > Also the saw waves are less useful than you'd think with FM- it > > enables some interesting flavors that a DX definately can't do (at > > least the sine-wave-only synths), bright square and saw timbres (even > > a decent approximation of pulsewidth modulation), but mostly when used > > with FM it just sounds harsh and distorted, regardless of frequency > > ratio- and with no filters, the brighter sounds end up being pretty > > static. > >I don't see that, since with feedback (what also creates saw type timbres) >and 3 >Operators I can recreate nearly every non resonant CZ waveform and be able >to >simulate filter sweeps (with static waveforms it lacks quality). Feedback >or >those static saw waveforms are needed for rich non sinusoid timbres I know the feedback is cool (particularly multiple-operator feedback loops which do wonderful strange things)- but I remember messing with this for quite a while, FM really isn't much good for broad-spectrum sounds, it does an okay impersonation of a resonant filter sweep, but it acts more like a bandpass filter. You can get a "sort of" saw wave using feedback but it's either got not enough bass or not enough trebel. Fiddling with it a bunch and layering waveforms does some good but it's much easier to get full-spectrum waves on the VZ (...though as I said, no filter, which limits usefulness). Anyway the DX7 is never going to do PWM, I think the SY77 and 99 can do it but in a different way. >Shouldn't be ones first synth and one should be a passionate FM geek to get >along >with it. But I could imagine making a song with this synth only... making a song, sure, but I wouldn't want to do much more than one, I'd end up beating my head against the wall trying to get a certain sound on the VZ when the ESQ-M can do it much easier and much better.
Message
Re: [CZsynth] VZ users-would you please say "I"
2005-08-26 by Scott Nordlund
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.