Yahoo Groups archive

Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:42 UTC

Message

Re: [CZsynth] VZ users-would you please say "I"

2005-08-26 by Scott Nordlund

> > It's really pretty limited for straight FM- the voice structure is
> > versitile enough in theory, but when operator pairs are strictly
> > limited to a modulator:carrier ratio of 2:1, it really constricts
> > things.  It works well enough for a 2-operator pair ring-modulated
> > with another wave, but it doesn't have near the flexibility of FM
> > algorithms.
>
>That's not completely true if you use 4 Operators you can have at least two
>operators with free definable fequencies, check my tutorial...

I know how that works, it's just not as nice as the algorithm structure of a 
DX7, which I think included most useful combinations.  So yeah, I can get FM 
with two modulators and one carrier, or longer multi-operator chains, but it 
doesn't cover all of the DX7 territory.

At least on the VZ though the pitch menu is much nicer...


> > Also the saw waves are less useful than you'd think with FM- it
> > enables some interesting flavors that a DX definately can't do (at
> > least the sine-wave-only synths), bright square and saw timbres (even
> > a decent approximation of pulsewidth modulation), but mostly when used
> > with FM it just sounds harsh and distorted, regardless of frequency
> > ratio- and with no filters, the brighter sounds end up being pretty
> > static.
>
>I don't see that, since with feedback (what also creates saw type timbres) 
>and 3
>Operators I can recreate nearly every non resonant CZ waveform and be able 
>to
>simulate filter sweeps (with static waveforms it lacks quality). Feedback 
>or
>those static saw waveforms are needed for rich non sinusoid timbres

I know the feedback is cool (particularly multiple-operator feedback loops 
which do wonderful strange things)- but I remember messing with this for 
quite a while, FM really isn't much good for broad-spectrum sounds, it does 
an okay impersonation of a resonant filter sweep, but it acts more like a 
bandpass filter.  You can get a "sort of" saw wave using feedback but it's 
either got not enough bass or not enough trebel.  Fiddling with it a bunch 
and layering waveforms does some good but it's much easier to get 
full-spectrum waves on the VZ (...though as I said, no filter, which limits 
usefulness).  Anyway the DX7 is never going to do PWM, I think the SY77 and 
99 can do it but in a different way.


>Shouldn't be ones first synth and one should be a passionate FM geek to get 
>along
>with it. But I could imagine making a song with this synth only...

making a song, sure, but I wouldn't want to do much more than one, I'd end 
up beating my head against the wall trying to get a certain sound on the VZ 
when the ESQ-M can do it much easier and much better.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.