--- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "ezra buchla" <ezra.buchla@...> wrote: > > > Great example! Sonic Youth's early output was a cacophonous mess, > > along the lines of early Boyd Rice. Then they started getting > > popular when they started recording pop songs (such as Sugarcane). > > Those pop songs are what made Sonic Youth a household name, and > > Pavement rips off nothing but their pop songs. You wouldn't see > > Pavement trying to rip-off the sound of Sonic Youth's early > > recordings! > > beyond the aesthetic calls, can we agree that sonic youth might have > had a hard time surviving those first few years if the people who > liked their messy noise had obtained high-quality recordings for free > instead of buying them / if SST hadn't been able to stay in the black? No, why is it important to you that I agree with you? > > can you just please respect that point? I don't think I've been disrespecting any of your points. Refutations are not disrespectful to people with healthy egos. I don't agree with your conclusion and I've stated the reasons why, in clear, plain, and extensive language. What more do you want from me? Apparently, you will not be satisfied until I agree with you, and you think my not agreeing with you is disrespectful. Sorry, your royal highness, but that doesn't fly in my world. > i swear to god, once nanofaxes become cheap and popular, and people's > e.g. sheet metal fabriction skills can no longer be compensated, we're > going to hear a different tune from a lot of folks. > Yeah and I'm sure there were world-wide labour strikes in the Star Trek universe when the replicator was invented. So, progress can be an interesting and exciting thing to behold. If there's one thing that is consistent in human civilization over the eons, it's perpetual social turmoil. And I for one prefer that, with all its inherent challenges, to stagnation.
Message
Re: music economics
2008-08-12 by zoinky420
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.