I Have the service manual for Casio CZ 5000: http://www.4shared.com/file/40060398/87aff40d/Casio_CZ_5000_Service_Manual.html :) 2009/2/12 korgpolyex800 <korgpolyex800@...> > Hi all, > > I have a VZ-10M but haven't been doing much with it because I am the > engineer that produced the HAWK-800 kit for the Korg Poly-800. > > Let me give you a bit of an idea how difficult the task was. > > I started the project late 2006. I began by determining if it was > feasible to change the hardware to use a larger amount of memory if it > was supplied to owners in some sort of a kit. I then moved on to > beginning to disassemble/reverse engineer the little 8K ROM where the > Poly-800 software resides. Although the Poly-800 is analog, it is > still mostly software controlled. About March 2007 I realized the idea > was very possible and I developed a prototype board. I then began the > tedious task of reverse engineering all of the 8K of software. Toward > the end of 2007 I had added quite a few new MIDI features including > SYSEX patch send and receive as well as adding MIDI controllers for > VCF cutoff, resonance etc. At that point I had enough interest from > Poly owners that I developed the printed circuit board, the > construction and installation instructions and MIDI implementation > charts etc. In March 2008 the kit was made available and about 25 or > so have gone out the door to happy Poly-800 fans. From March 2008 > until now, I've developed MIDI NRPN control of parameter editing, two > new SLFO's are implemented, the well known modifications called FM-800 > and Moog Slayer are now under envelope or LFO modulation control and > the list goes on. And the development is still underway as I am now > trying to develop a third kit that will fit into the Poly-800 MK2. > > However, the Casio's CZ/VZ series are a completely different animal > compared to the Poly-800. But I'll have a look at the schematics (if > they're available somewhere) and see if I think it would be possible. > My thinking is that such a project (if technically possible) would > take around three to four years to make happen. I say that because of > my own experience with the Poly-800 HAWK-800 project and because the > Casio CZ/VZ series are a far more complex instrument. > > Now where are those schematics? > > Mike. > > --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com <CZsynth%40yahoogroups.com>, "F.Manduca" > <resistenzaaoltranza@...> > wrote: > > > > > Well, it would be nice if someone could help us mod this beautiful > machine......Even only getting more output level, with a better S/N > ratio.... > > > > --- Mer 11/2/09, jeff bornhoeft <jbornhoeft@...> ha scritto: > > Da: jeff bornhoeft <jbornhoeft@...> > > Oggetto: Re: [CZsynth] Has anyone ever tried to update this synth 2 > make it respond real-time to sysex? > > A: CZsynth@...m <CZsynth%40yahoogroups.com> > > Data: Mercoledì 11 febbraio 2009, 23:38 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attempting something like this would probably mean you'd > have to have a > > > > spare CZ synth to experiment on, as you'd need to be able to > update/modify > > > > the firmware. I for one, am not willing to part with my CZ. I don't > really > > > > know enough about electronics to be able to attempt something like that > > > > anyhow. The Korg Poly 800 is an analog synth, which means > modifications like > > > > that would be much, much easier. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:20 PM, dreamend <dreamend@yahoo. co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only someone should! (not me, I can't solder or program for peanuts).. > > > > > > > > > > but over at the korg poly 800 groups, there's people doing all sorts > > > > > of crazy tweakifying midi updates controlling cutoffs and what not. > > > > > > > > > > We need to show the world how brilliant our beloved CZs can be. > > > > > Imagine the wonderful feeling of raising the DCW envelope with a nice > > > > > big knob (ahem). > > > > > > > > > > I think the value of these synths would go up a lot if someone figured > > > > > it out. Well I think their value will go up in the future anyway, as > > > > > they are lush and unique sounding synths....but real-time sysex > > > > > control would just be to die for.... > > > > > > > > > > C'mon CZ-freaks, let's get physical! > > > > > > > > > > P.S Sorry, but I have no clue about how hard this is to do or > > > > > schematics or anything like that, so if I sound ridculously naive, > > > > > please forgive me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Passa a Yahoo! Mail. > > > > La webmail che ti offre GRATIS spazio illimitato, > > antispam e messenger integrato. > > http://it.mail.yahoo.com/              > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > -- Patrick Wichrowski tecladista e maluco de plantão www.myspace.com/patrickwichrowski [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [CZsynth] Re: Has anyone ever tried to update this synth 2 make it respond real-time to sysex?
2009-02-12 by Patrick Wichrowski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.