Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

Gary,

I did not think the post was off-topic nor particularly commercial. It is just an informative video about a new Casio keyboard that has stirred up interest. In my opinion, the post was not spam or commercial, it was informative. I know somebody else can see it differently, but that happens all the time in life and you can see it in this group.

One issue that is clouding this discussion is that it's not clear the XW line are going to be welcomed into the "family". There are some similarities, there are some differences. Different people in the group will seem them as more similar or more different depending on their own internal filters.

I agree with you that I don't like a million splinter groups. Sometime in the future we will know if the XW line has enough interest to support its own group. For now, the answer is not clear.


--- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "Gary G." <happyrat1@...> wrote:
>
> I guess I understand.  Fair enough.  Even though I sort of considered the XW line to be the logical successor to the CZ line in the near future and since the universe really doesn't need 10 Bazillion splinter groups for each product I sort of assumed XW posts would be welcome in this group.
> 
> Then again if that's how you and everyone here feel about it I'll just unsubscribe from the group and restrict my future queries to the PX-WK-CTK group instead.
> 
> Sorry to drag you all off topic.  Feel free to unsubscribe me from the list.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Gary
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> All The World's A Stage
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 6/7/12, Summa <flotorian@...> wrote:
> 
> > From: Summa <flotorian@...>
> > Subject: Re: [CZsynth] Re: New To Group: Seeking XW-P1 Cakewalk INS File
> > To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, June 7, 2012, 9:06 PM
> > Hi Gary,
> > 
> > don't get me wrong, but I'm not happy when ppl. start to
> > post links 
> > to promotional videos here, even if it's recent Casio gear,
> > since I 
> > want to keep this group as clean of spam as possible...
> > 
> > Thanx!
> >      Summa
> > 
> > 
> > On 7 Jun 2012 at 21:53, happyrat1 wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Casio's Mike Martin did a live one hour video workshop
> > on the XW-P1
> > > the other night and the video is archived here.
> > > 
> > > http://www.ustream.tv/channel/casiomusicgear#events
> > > 
> > > He's also planning a possible workshop on the XW-G1
> > perhaps next
> > > month.
> > > 
> > > Definitely worth checking out if you are considering
> > buying one of
> > > these anytime in the near future.  He goes into
> > explanations of the
> > > major features in exhaustive detail.
> > > 
> > > Gary
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com,
> > bill bigrig <billbigrig@> wrote: >
> > > > I understand that this is a "groove" synth. I have
> > a Yamaha DJX,
> > > (lame), a DJX-II, (pretty good), and a Roland JX-305,
> > (OK, but
> > > difficult learning curve). I would REALLY like to hear
> > opinions how
> > > this synth stacks up against these and similar "groove
> > synths). I am
> > > tempted to buy one, then maybe I can comment. But, you
> > know, Money.
> > > Anyone who can give comparisons of these synths, I
> > would appreciate. >
> > > Rig > > [Non-text portions of this message have
> > been removed] >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > CZ/VZ         mailing
> > list    : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CZsynth
> > FMHeaven    mailing list    :
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fmheaven/
> > FS1R        mailing
> > list    : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fs1r/    
> > Vokator        mailing
> > list    : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vokator
> > FM-Synthesis    mailing
> > list    : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fm-
> > synthesis/
> > 
> > http://www.summasounds.de/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> >     CZsynth-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
> > 
> >
>