On the 8m you can program panning separately from the patch, basically you can program the sound and then set the whole thing to pan according to auto pan, fixed pan or controller pan. On the 10m you have to assign particular voices to particular outputs and this is then hardwired into the patch. To create a lot of stereo effect on the 10m you wind up halving its polyphony. So the 8m is a little more sophisticated at least in that regard. I always got the impression that the VZ1/10m and all the CZ's were at heart mono instruments even though some of them have stereo outs. Jon -----Original Message----- From: Scott Nordlund [mailto:gsn10@...] Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 11:19 AM To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [CZsynth] VZ comparison question... >The 8m is probably the best way to go. It has much better handling of >stereo >output than the 10m which only outputs in stereo at the cost off polyphony. >Of course by itself the 8m only has ½ the polyphony anyway. But you can >link >2 8ms together to get full 16 voice polyphony although I have never done this is person. really? how is the stereo output done in the 8m? .
Message
RE: [CZsynth] VZ comparison question...
2002-07-15 by Furman, Jon W.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.