Yahoo Groups archive

Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:42 UTC

Thread

Re: [CZsynth] Digest Number 799

Re: [CZsynth] Digest Number 799

2005-08-26 by onephatcat@earthlink.net

it was cheaper than anything else & the multitibrality sounded like a dream come true for a young kid like me.  I think i payed $400 in 85 or 86. I wish I had a working one now. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----

From:  CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
Subj:  [CZsynth] Digest Number 799
Date:  Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:38 am
Size:  7K
To:  CZsynth@yahoogroups.com


There are 4 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

      1. okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else buy the CZ's?
           From: "M.J.B." <yazzofever@...>
      2. Re: okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else buy the CZ's?
           From: "Rocky Rodenbach" <yooper@...>
      3. Re: okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else buy the CZ's?
           From: "Summa" <flotorian@...>
      4. RE: okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else buy the C
           From: "Scott Nordlund" <gsn10@...>


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 1         
   Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
   From: "M.J.B." <yazzofever@...>
Subject: okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else buy the CZ's?

okay steve, scott, summa and rocky...

so it's not a dx, but why did people buy the
cz101 back in 1984, even more then that in '86
with the "1."

Who was Casio targeting?  Was is just people who
couldn't program or who didn't have enough $?

And if I hadn't of been 6 in 1984, and let's say
I would have had the money to buy a DX7, were
there people out there who actually bought the
casio cz series over the dx series?  Why?  Did
you?  


micah


y[]a[]z[]z[]o[]f[]e[]v[]e[]r[]

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 2         
   Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:44:11 -0400
   From: "Rocky Rodenbach" <yooper@...>
Subject: Re: okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else buy the CZ's?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "M.J.B." <yazzofever@...>
To: <CZsynth@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:31 PM
Subject: [CZsynth] okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else 
buy the CZ's?


> okay steve, scott, summa and rocky...
>
> so it's not a dx, but why did people buy the
> cz101 back in 1984, even more then that in '86
> with the "1."
>
> Who was Casio targeting?  Was is just people who
> couldn't program or who didn't have enough $?
>
> And if I hadn't of been 6 in 1984, and let's say
> I would have had the money to buy a DX7, were
> there people out there who actually bought the
> casio cz series over the dx series?  Why?  Did
> you?
>
>
> micah


Actually, I would think most people bought the CZ101 over the CZ1000 because 
of the price.  The CZ101 had the same architecture the CZ1000 had, but it 
had mini keys vs. the full sized keys the CZ1000 offered.
    I think Casio was targeting the low end user on a limited budget yet 
still wanted a synth that had a lot of features.  I don't think that lack of 
programming came in to that much, the CZ only came with 16 preset sounds, so 
you still have the learn the in's and out's if you want to expand the range 
of what was there.
    I really don't know the percentage of people who would favor the CZ over 
the DX7.  I would have to strongly assume that the serious studio musicians 
and the like would choose the DX7 over it's velocity and pressure sensitive 
keys, mod wheel, breath controller, 16 note polyphony, etc.  Plus, the DX7 
is built like a tank, a very good keyboard to take on the road.  Like I 
mentioned, I still like my CZ even through it no longer works, I need to 
find one on Ebay one of these days.

    Rocky 



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 3         
   Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:26:26 +0200
   From: "Summa" <flotorian@...>
Subject: Re: okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else buy the CZ's?

Hi,

On 24 Aug 2005 at 13:31, M.J.B. wrote:

> okay steve, scott, summa and rocky...
> 
> so it's not a dx, but why did people buy the
> cz101 back in 1984, even more then that in '86
> with the "1."

Probably since it was more affordable than a DX7, multitimbral, easier to 
programm... 
 
> Who was Casio targeting?  Was is just people who
> couldn't program or who didn't have enough $?

Well, soundprogramming with the DX7 isn't easy, at my current state of experience 
it don't make a difference if it's a DX7 or CZ-1 but for a beginner FM Synthesis 
has a steep learning curve...
Other than that even a CZ can do quite some sounds a DX7 isn't able to do and of 
course vice versa. Also the sound character is different...

> And if I hadn't of been 6 in 1984, and let's say
> I would have had the money to buy a DX7, were
> there people out there who actually bought the
> casio cz series over the dx series?  Why?  Did
> you?  

I was targeting a DX7 at that time, but it was a good thing I wasn't able to 
afford one. Since I bought a TX81z a year after the CZ-1 and had a hard time 
getting into the programming...

...Summa





-- 

CZ/VZ 		mailing list	: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CZsynth
FMHeaven	mailing list	: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fmheaven/
FS1R 		mailing list	: http://www.ampfea.org/mailman/listinfo/fss-list
Vokator		mailing list	: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vokator


Wellenform Chat  So and Do 22.00 CET: http://chat.moogulator.com/


________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Message: 4         
   Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:15:13 -0400
   From: "Scott Nordlund" <gsn10@...>
Subject: RE: okay so it isn't fm but hey...why did you or anyone else buy the C

>so it's not a dx, but why did people buy the
>cz101 back in 1984, even more then that in '86
>with the "1."

Well it's not competition for the DX7, but it's still got some unique and 
interesting sounds.  I think it's best to not try emulating synths with 
other synths...the CZ maybe isn't the best for DX sounds, but try to get a 
Prophet 5 patch on a DX7...

>Who was Casio targeting?  Was is just people who
>couldn't program or who didn't have enough $?

That's a good question to ask with a lot of Casio products- does anyone 
really need a boombox/keyboard combo, or a calculator with vibrato?


>And if I hadn't of been 6 in 1984, and let's say
>I would have had the money to buy a DX7, were
>there people out there who actually bought the
>casio cz series over the dx series?  Why?  Did
>you?

I might have gone for both.




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links



 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.