I 100% agree. I don't get it either. --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, Mountain Man <mtman@c...> wrote: > That seens *very* odd. The values supplied directly through control knob, and indirectly through modulation have *opposite* effects on the envelope parameters ???? That sounds crazy! Did Dave say why he designed it that way? Counter-intuitive UI decisions like this always make a synth harder to use > (at least for me, but I suspect for most folks); I'm surprised he did this. > > Elby > > > > I don't know if this will help you guys or not, but realize that the > > value(s) you apply with a modulator (sequencer, LFO, AT, etc.) to > > affect one of the new Envelope parameter mod destinations works > > OPPOSITE of the actual envelope parameters themselves. > > > > For example, when you want a longer Envelope Attack, you INCREASE the > > value of the Attack, right? However, if you apply a POSITIVE value > > to Envelope Attack via a modulator, you will DECREASE the Attack time. > > > > That seemed backward to me, but Dave confirmed that was his intent. > > It all works fine (at least for me!), just as soon as you realize > > what's going on. > > > > Ski
Message
Re: OS 2.0 - New Envelope Parameter Mod Destinations
2003-10-18 by Ravi Ivan Sharma
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.