Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:43 UTC

Message

Re: [Evolver] Re: Evolver Rack - Capabilities vs. Price

2003-10-22 by Joe

On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:11:20PM -0000, ski_ex5tech wrote:
>    The Evo Rack hardware is essentially four "regular" Evolvers crammed
>    into a 1U rack.  The "regular" Evolver is about $500 USD.  Multiply
>    that by four, and you get $2,000 USD.  Even allowing for savings due
>    to the reduction of the count of common items such as the enclosure,
>    power supply, etc., $1,200 to $1,500 USD sounds pretty good to me.
>    If $500 is an "outrageously great value" for a monophonic Evolver,
>    then $1,200 to $1,500 for a four voice Evolver is even more
>    outrageous.

these are all good points and they make sense.  it just seems a bit odd
to me. I think that's mainly because I figured that even though the
Evolver is cheap, Dave probably had some of that price to help him gain
back the money spent in R&D. but since the rack version is very similar
to the Evolver (and Dave said himself it was pretty easy to get it
working), he probably spent very little on R&D this time around.

I don't know. the price isn't necessarily out of line with other
polyphonic analogs out there (for example, the Vermona Perfourmer has
four voices and is about $900, but has no built-in sequencers), but I
just expected a better bargain I guess.

I mean, last I checked the Andromeda (16 analog voices) was going for
around $1600 used.  it might be difficult (for me at least) to get the
rack Evolver knowing that :-)

>    Keep in mind that this is not a "virtual analog" machine we're
>    talking about.  If you want to quadruple the polyphony, you have to
>    quadruple most of the hardware.  Make sense?

well, except for the digital side.

Joe

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.