Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

bollocks Julian, had a bad day? Nobody's whining, we all love da Evo here
right? It has a major limitation in its CC# implementation that's all... 
anyway if you read the posts before deciding to shout you'd know I've got a 
real controller (IBK) but
sysex is by no means as convenient - especially for PERFORMANCE intruments 
like
windcontrollers and buchla lightning which don't tend to have sysex! Unless 
pressure is put to DSI and on forums like this for what users want then 
nothing will
ever happen right?

IMO the Evo is a near perfect synth, the inevitable limitations of its low
cost and UI could be overcome with more flexible CC# implementation... Dave 
suggested to me this may be possible in a future OS, but maybe that will 
never happen, if so then I'd quite like to know. That's all.

Try chamomile tea

Richard

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "julian" <jujulilianan@...>
To: <DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Evolver] OT: G2's and the Evolver (was Re: I think I have a
problem...)


> afro_88 wrote:
>
>> I agree that if the Evolver had
>>cc's it would be much better for live work. It would also enable you
>>to tweak more than one parameter at once. That's about the only thing
>>I would like to change about the Evolver - everything else is great!
>>
>>
> AAAARGH! GET A REAL CONTROLLER AND YOU CAN DO THIS!
>
> PEAVEY PC-1600!!!
> PEAVEY PC-1600X!!!
>
> go on ebay. get one. and spend time automating evolver sounds, rather
> than going online and whining about not being able to.
>
> It's not the evolver's fault that all the modern, cheaply made laptop
> accessory midi controllers available on the market have an abortion of a
> SysEx spec.
>
> sorry to shout, but this continued ill-informed complaining about the
> evolver's design is plain retarded.
> get gear that can do the job you want, or just get over it.
>
>
> thanks.
>
>
>
> julian
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>