Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

Also, Don't forget that several controllers sending SYSEX at the same 
time will choke up a midi pipe very quick.  CC's use much less 
bandwidth. I asked for CC's too long ago, and Dave too said maybe.

Thing is, you only get a resolution of 128 steps, so something like the 
Filter which has greater resolution (164 I think,)  you may hear 
stepping.  But that's what the LFO's, sequencer, envelopes are for  :)

I still want CC's though....  we have a few



Richard BT wrote:
> bollocks Julian, had a bad day? Nobody's whining, we all love da Evo here
> right? It has a major limitation in its CC# implementation that's all... 
> anyway if you read the posts before deciding to shout you'd know I've got a 
> real controller (IBK) but
> sysex is by no means as convenient - especially for PERFORMANCE intruments 
> like
> windcontrollers and buchla lightning which don't tend to have sysex! Unless 
> pressure is put to DSI and on forums like this for what users want then 
> nothing will
> ever happen right?
> 
> IMO the Evo is a near perfect synth, the inevitable limitations of its low
> cost and UI could be overcome with more flexible CC# implementation... Dave 
> suggested to me this may be possible in a future OS, but maybe that will 
> never happen, if so then I'd quite like to know. That's all.
> 
> Try chamomile tea
> 
> Richard
>