Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

Hey Christopher,

I think Trippler sumed it up (about the matrix).
Having worked a lot with my mono in the last two weeks, i realised
that since OS3 was released it pretty much took care of all my 
reservations about the matrix. I prefer having a controller (novation 
remote25) that can be configure and reconfigure to my taste instead 
of having fixed parameters. ALso, i too don't think i would like all 
knobs to be smooth cause it really can drive you crazy when you're 
just trying to step to the next parameter. I have worked a lot with a 
microwave XT and althought i love that synth, it just a pain 
sometimes to get to some parameters.

It's just that i always wanted to have a 3 octaves synth like an 
Access indigo but with the Evolver engine....:)

SImon




--- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, all@... wrote:
>
> 
> 
> Greetings Simon,
> 
> 	Would you care to elaborate on the mono Evolver and just what 
> it is about the matrix that inhibits play?
> 
> 	Having just discovered the Evolver, I am very tempted to
> purchase the mono. Being a keyboard player, however, and hearing of 
your
> 'reservations' is giving me pause.
> 
> 	Thanks very much for any comments.
> 
> 	Best wishes
> 
> 
> 	Christopher
> 
> ------
> >Message: 1        
> >    Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:43:42 -0000
> >    From: "Simon " <simonvolt@...>
> >Subject: Re: MEK over MONO
> >
> >Thank you Stephan !
> >
> >I can see every details in the photo.
> >I really like the idea of having 16 blue LEds for the sequencer.
> >I just feel i would play more with evo if i could work with a UI
> >like the MEK has instead of a matrix like the first EVOLver serie.
> >Very tempting indeed...
> >
> Regards,
>