Hey Christopher,
I think Trippler sumed it up (about the matrix).
Having worked a lot with my mono in the last two weeks, i realised
that since OS3 was released it pretty much took care of all my
reservations about the matrix. I prefer having a controller (novation
remote25) that can be configure and reconfigure to my taste instead
of having fixed parameters. ALso, i too don't think i would like all
knobs to be smooth cause it really can drive you crazy when you're
just trying to step to the next parameter. I have worked a lot with a
microwave XT and althought i love that synth, it just a pain
sometimes to get to some parameters.
It's just that i always wanted to have a 3 octaves synth like an
Access indigo but with the Evolver engine....:)
SImon
--- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, all@... wrote:
>
>
>
> Greetings Simon,
>
> Would you care to elaborate on the mono Evolver and just what
> it is about the matrix that inhibits play?
>
> Having just discovered the Evolver, I am very tempted to
> purchase the mono. Being a keyboard player, however, and hearing of
your
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 'reservations' is giving me pause.
>
> Thanks very much for any comments.
>
> Best wishes
>
>
> Christopher
>
> ------
> >Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:43:42 -0000
> > From: "Simon " <simonvolt@...>
> >Subject: Re: MEK over MONO
> >
> >Thank you Stephan !
> >
> >I can see every details in the photo.
> >I really like the idea of having 16 blue LEds for the sequencer.
> >I just feel i would play more with evo if i could work with a UI
> >like the MEK has instead of a matrix like the first EVOLver serie.
> >Very tempting indeed...
> >
> Regards,
>
