"John" <jpyyz@...> writes: > In the digital osc section shouldn't you be able to set the initial > shape to 97? If you could do that, then wouldn't that make zero in > the sequencer equal to 97. So 97-128 = 0-32 for the seq. If I recall correctly, when using the digital-osc "shape sequence" parameter, the numbers coming from the sequencer are used "absolutely", not added to the oscillator's shape parameter. [Quite annoying too, I think; I'd love it if that got fixed!] -Miles -- Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here, beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
Message
Re: wavesequencing and user waveforms
2006-04-28 by Miles Bader