I have had absolutely no problems what so ever with the ST editor except when using a midisport. Since i got midex interfaces, its been smooth sailing. I guess there are some issues with some devices and the software --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, "Pierre Zeeman" <pierrezee@...> wrote: > > >general, but would never use it in VSTi mode (WAY to many crashes, way > >to many bugs). Midi quest takes forever to load up and its just > > Different here. I haven't had a serious crash yet although I have had a few > weird sysex issues with the current build. As far as loading is concerned, > I don't try to load the top level MQ format (with all the plumbing) but > rather a much lower level one that just contains the patch. But even with > the most bloated file type, it still takes less time to load than certain > other plugs. The MQ side does seem a bit crufty, though, and I look forward > to them moving to a more streamlined architecture. > > It's not perfect as a VST but it's still very usable and my experience of it > has mostly been of transparency: I just use it and don't think too much > about it. It's certainly been less trouble than a friend's experience with > a virus TI. I don't use the standalone mode any more, but when I did I'd > have to disagree that the graphical benefits were purely cosmetic: the > dynamic sequencer edit mode makes it very easy to set up complex > interrelating patterns with the sequencers because you can see what is > happening on each step. > > Equally fwiw, my experiences of the ST editor were far less salutory: it > would occasionally lock up my computer (sometimes taking it down entirely) > whenever a sysex dump took place. > > Apparently psicraft are going to release a demo as soon as the 1.0 is out. > You could always wait until then and then compare them directly for > yourself... > > _________________________________________________________________ > Discover the magic of RSS feeds at MSN South Africa! http://za.msn.com/ >
Message
Re: which editor
2006-09-09 by altitude909