well , you only answeered one of my questions (sort of) . and its NOT nitpickey to at least play even 6 notes at a time--- In fact my old primitive 1984 juno has 6 voices . yes the Andromeda features 16 voices and only costs $400 more than the PEK , so i dont buy the cost argument. Im not antidigital I love the hybrid aspects of the PEK, just not the pathetically limited number of voices. It didnt make the PEK superior to the competition. DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, X + Z = 0 <xpluszequalszero@...> wrote: > > evolver has 4 osc for one voice > prophet has 2 osc for one voice > > pek with more than 4 voices would cost a lot more and for what i > understand why the chose for 4, was that more would be overkill soundwise > do you ever read or understand signalflow charts that are in the manual??? > > the only analog poly synth thats is new and has more voices is the andy > > others are pure digital > > evolver is hybrid > > o yeah don't get smart ass like a lot of people in the synthcommunity > nit picking everything and the ever so bored digital vs analog talk, etc > enjoy making sounds, nothing is perfect! > > > > > > > > But if you dont use the effects [have them turned off] does it still > > get the conversion? So you can generally dupilicate all Prophet 08 > > sounds with the PEK? otherwise , if the hardware and sound is > > basically the same, is there any other good reason that they didnt > > just use the same 8 voice base sound generator for BOTH models? Im > > always wondering why the PEK is limited to 4 voices when the cheaper > > Prophet has 8. The company claims it was to keep the cost of the PEK > > down, but that argument seems weak when you limit the top end, > > "flagship" synth so much, when other companies produce synths with > > 10/16/30/32/128 voices now. > > > > -- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:DSI_Evolver%40yahoogroups.com>, Robert Krueger > > <robert.krueger@> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, but the Prophet also has a complete analog signal path. The analog > > > voices are never converted where as the Evolver analog voices get a > > digital > > > conversion through the effects and then back to analog again at the > > DACs. > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:54 PM, wasteking1 <wasteking1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are the tone of the voices and analog oscillators the same? the > > PEK adding > > > > the digital voices and effects, but otherwise on the same base sound > > > > generator? but the prophet has 8 voices to the PEK 's 4? In other > > words are > > > > the voices the same hardware? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > http://xpluszequalszero.blogspot.com/ > http://www.myspace.com/wravenveerendegebarstehoofden >
Message
Re: comparison: prophet 08 to PEK
2009-07-13 by wasteking1
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.