Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:43 UTC

Message

Re: [DSI Synths] DSI - "no to 4 voice PEK upgrade"

2010-03-11 by wasteking1

i never said the new features werent good, but to shortchange on polyphony negates a lot of the other improvements. im glad to hear you so zealously defend the PEK's shortcomings--- im not afraid to admit them  and  maybe get the company to improve it-- the thing is NOT  perfect and certainly can be improved. But i suppose every corporation  appreciates its YES-men followers.

--- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, tzachi keinan <zahush76@...> wrote:
>
> Even your  dinosaur 80's synths have 6 voices, indeed. 
> But do they have a hybrid osc generator, 4 lfo's, envelope generators, 4 4x16 step squencers, a complex modulation matrix, 3 syncable delays, feedback, hack (... should i go on...?).
> So yeah, it's short on polyphony - but don't compare it to your 80's dinosaur synths, since it beats them on all the other departments.
> 
> --- On Thu, 3/11/10, wasteking1 <wasteking1@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: wasteking1 <wasteking1@...>
> Subject: Re: [DSI Synths] DSI - "no to 4 voice PEK upgrade"
> To: DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, March 11, 2010, 3:00 PM
> 
> 
> Â  
> 
> 
> 
> a seperate expansion unit sounds fine in theory,maybe good for the hiding-in-the- studio-types but is of little live convienience, and totally kills easy portability- -- as i said before--LOOK INSIDE THE PEK--- its HALF EMPTY--- plenty of room for more voice circuits --- even on a modular plug-in/add on basis. (2 at a time?) even just 6 voices would keep me from having a dropout problem while simply playing one program with two hands.and certainly it limits what kind things you can do with partial 'unison' voice allocations. . Obviously DSI considered 8 fine for the CHEAPER Prophet---why not their 'flagship' model? Its a real shortcoming in the marketplace.
> 
> --- In DSI_Evolver@ yahoogroups. com, "meatballfulton" <hubcapbrian@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In DSI_Evolver@ yahoogroups. com, "wasteking1" <wasteking1@ > wrote:
> > > How come the PEK pot version could be so quickly adapted? 
> > > how many people asked DSI for it or ws it just Dave's idea? 
> > 
> > Based on all the complaints about encoders I've seen in Evo discussions, it must have been a LOT of people asking for it. Dave obviously likes the encoders (as do I).
> > 
> > > How many people would like 8 voices???? (even my dinosaur 80's 
> > > synths have 6)
> > 
> > Poly expansion leaves the option up to the end user, the people who want the extra voices can buy them. While it's not as convenient as having all 8 voices onboard the PEK, MEK and DEVO users can also make use of it.
> > 
> > I've heard similar complaints about hooking up a Mopho keyboard to a Tetra, and the Mopho keyboard hasn't even been released yet!!!
> >
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.