>The reason behind this is to still have the flexibility of the matrix
>but with additional "fixed" controller/sysex for things you are using
>quite often (Filter, Q, Level, etc.). Also, having 16 buttons you can
>forget about the shift function.
>
>Anyway, I read the manual and it does not seem to work anyway. I will
>download the PC1600 template for the evolver and start from there.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Cord
>
>
>--- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, mr julian <jujulilianan@...> wrote:
>
>
>>You can't. But I'm not sure why you'd want to, anyway.
>>
>>there is a set of PC1600 presets available (from memory, on the DSE
>>site) to download that make the PC1600 control an evolver. The presets
>>are organised into 'pages' that address different parts of the synth,
>>like oscillators, filters, envelopes. LFO's, etc. Download that, get it
>>in your PC1600, and have a play.
>>
>>
>>
>>julian
>>
>>
>>cord_mueller wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>This is my first mail here on the list. I am getting a little mono
>>>evolver hopefully by end of this week. I looked at the user interface
>>>and I wonder if I can make it more "userfriendly" by using my PC1600.
>>>My question is: can I setup the 1600 this way that it functions as the
>>>8 encoders with the buttons switching between the matrix rows?
>>>
>>>Cord
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>