Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Dave Smith Instruments SYNTHESIZERS

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:43 UTC

Thread

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by Stefan Trippler

Hi Herman,

from my point of view I'd just say no.

Gru\ufffd
Stefan

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "arrakian" <arrakian@...>
To: "Evolver" <DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 5:06 AM
Subject: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave


> Hi all,
> I was wondering, can the Evolvers emulate the PPG Wave sound? As I
> understand it, the PPG is digital put through analogue filters. Would
> the PEK's analogue through digital signal sound similar? Could
> someone post examples? I like the PPPG sound, but it IS an old
> machine...
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by William Soraparu

Absolutely...not like PPG...PolyEvolver has its own character.....very unique!!

Stefan Trippler wrote:
Hi Herman,

from my point of view I'd just say no.

Gru\ufffd
Stefan

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "arrakian"
To: "Evolver"
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 5:06 AM
Subject: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave


> Hi all,
> I was wondering, can the Evolvers emulate the PPG Wave sound? As I
> understand it, the PPG is digital put through analogue filters. Would
> the PEK's analogue through digital signal sound similar? Could
> someone post examples? I like the PPPG sound, but it IS an old
> machine...
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by Ravi Ivan Sharma

PPG's are wavetable synthesizers in which a series of waves is sweeped in the "oscillator" to create a moving sound even before it hits the filters, amps, lfo's and envelope generators. The evolver has a wave table, but each of the sounds in it are used one at a time by each of the digital oscillators so the sound is not a "swept" sound (although you can play with that by sequencing the waves in the digital oscillators with the sequencer, but it is not a smooth transition between the waves like the ppgs and the Waldorf Wave and Microwaves achieved).
The PEK, in regard to its digital oscillators (it has two analog oscillators as well) is better termed digital through analog filters, rather than "analogue through digital signal" as you say.
For PPG style sounds, check out Waldorf's Wave, Microwave, Microwave II, Microwave XT and Microwave XTk. Out of those, only the Wave and Microwave have analog filters, but the digital filters on the II, XT and XTk are really, really good.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: arrakian
To: Evolver
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 11:06 PM
Subject: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

Hi all,
I was wondering, can the Evolvers emulate the PPG Wave sound? As I
understand it, the PPG is digital put through analogue filters. Would
the PEK's analogue through digital signal sound similar? Could
someone post examples? I like the PPPG sound, but it IS an old
machine...

Re: RE: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by Carbon111

>They are very different animals, to say the least.  If your looking for a
>PPG type sound, your looking at getting an original Microwave or a monowave
>if you can find one or the plans to build one.

The MicrowaveXT is an *excellent* "PPG Emulator" as well - aliasing can be enabled as well as a coarser table sweep for that "authentic PPG grunge"...plus it has the original PPG wavetables in it.

...of course it can sound a lot smoother (or coarser!) than the PPG as well due to more filter types, higher resolution oscillators and additional wavetables.

The Microwave XT is also a nice synth to pair with an Evolver: http://www.carbon111.com/studio4.jpg
^_^

Best Regards, James
--
http://www.carbon111.com

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by Scott Nordlund

>PPG's are wavetable synthesizers in which a series of waves is sweeped in 
>the "oscillator" to create a moving sound even before it hits the filters, 
>amps, lfo's and envelope generators. The evolver has a wave table, but each 
>of the sounds in it are used one at a time by each of the digital 
>oscillators so the sound is not a "swept" sound (although you can play with 
>that by sequencing the waves in the digital oscillators with the sequencer, 
>but it is not a smooth transition between the waves like the ppgs and the 
>Waldorf Wave and Microwaves achieved).

You can actually get complex waveform sweeps from the Evolver- use an LFO to 
crossfade between oscillators 3 and 4 and two sequences to change the 
waveforms, and set the output to mono.  The triangle wave on the LFO isn't 
ideal for this so it's a bit crude.  It's not actually a sweep in terms of 
what the PPG Wave does, it's more like wavesequencing on the Korg M1.  It's 
an interesting sound though, particularly if you use different length 
sequences.

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by arrakian

On May 6, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Scott Nordlund wrote:

> You can actually get complex waveform sweeps from the Evolver- use  
> an LFO to
> crossfade between oscillators 3 and 4 and two sequences to change the
> waveforms, and set the output to mono.  The triangle wave on the  
> LFO isn't
> ideal for this so it's a bit crude.  It's not actually a sweep in  
> terms of
> what the PPG Wave does, it's more like wavesequencing on the Korg  
> M1.  It's
> an interesting sound though, particularly if you use different length
> sequences.

Could you post an example? If I could get really close to the PPG  
sound with one keyboard, that can also emulate a Prophet, I'm good.

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by arrakian


On May 6, 2006, at 5:39 AM, Ravi Ivan Sharma wrote:

The PEK, in regard to its digital oscillators (it has two analog oscillators as well) is better termed digital through analog filters, rather than "analogue through digital signal" as you say.
For PPG style sounds, check out Waldorf's Wave, Microwave, Microwave II, Microwave XT and Microwave XTk. Out of those, only the Wave and Microwave have analog filters, but the digital filters on the II, XT and XTk are really, really good.

If I understand you, the PEK's digital through analogue filter sound is not as smooth as PPG? Because of a lack of sweeping?

Also, does the Wave/Microwave get closer to the PPG sound than the II/XT/XTk?

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by William Soraparu

Yes, the wave and microwave come very close to the PPG....

arrakian wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text

On May 6, 2006, at 5:39 AM, Ravi Ivan Sharma wrote:

The PEK, in regard to its digital oscillators (it has two analog oscillators as well) is better termed digital through analog filters, rather than "analogue through digital signal" as you say.
For PPG style sounds, check out Waldorf's Wave, Microwave, Microwave II, Microwave XT and Microwave XTk. Out of those, only the Wave and Microwave have analog filters, but the digital filters on the II, XT and XTk are really, really good.

If I understand you, the PEK's digital through analogue filter sound is not as smooth as PPG? Because of a lack of sweeping?

Also, does the Wave/Microwave get closer to the PPG sound than the II/XT/XTk?

Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by Ravi Ivan Sharma

You have it slightly wrong. I am saying that sequencing from one wave to another via the digital oscillators is not a smooth wavetable sweep like the PPGs and the Waldorfs do: Mainly because it is not designed to do wavetable synthesis. The passing of the signal through analog filters has nothing to do with this.
I think you really need to spend some time learning about wavetable synthesis from a site dedicated to waldorf synths. Once you understand what they are doing, you will realize that the PEK is not that kind of synth.
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: arrakian
To: Evolver
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave


On May 6, 2006, at 5:39 AM, Ravi Ivan Sharma wrote:

The PEK, in regard to its digital oscillators (it has two analog oscillators as well) is better termed digital through analog filters, rather than "analogue through digital signal" as you say.
For PPG style sounds, check out Waldorf's Wave, Microwave, Microwave II, Microwave XT and Microwave XTk. Out of those, only the Wave and Microwave have analog filters, but the digital filters on the II, XT and XTk are really, really good.

If I understand you, the PEK's digital through analogue filter sound is not as smooth as PPG? Because of a lack of sweeping?

Also, does the Wave/Microwave get closer to the PPG sound than the II/XT/XTk?

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by William Soraparu

Correct...read up on the PPG....check out Steinbergs PPG VST...Get near a Waldorf Microwave/Xtk....you'll understand better on why a PEK could never sound like a PPG

Ravi Ivan Sharma wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
You have it slightly wrong. I am saying that sequencing from one wave to another via the digital oscillators is not a smooth wavetable sweep like the PPGs and the Waldorfs do: Mainly because it is not designed to do wavetable synthesis. The passing of the signal through analog filters has nothing to do with this.
I think you really need to spend some time learning about wavetable synthesis from a site dedicated to waldorf synths. Once you understand what they are doing, you will realize that the PEK is not that kind of synth.
----- Original Message -----
From: arrakian
To: Evolver
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave


On May 6, 2006, at 5:39 AM, Ravi Ivan Sharma wrote:

The PEK, in regard to its digital oscillators (it has two analog oscillators as well) is better termed digital through analog filters, rather than "analogue through digital signal" as you say.
For PPG style sounds, check out Waldorf's Wave, Microwave, Microwave II, Microwave XT and Microwave XTk. Out of those, only the Wave and Microwave have analog filters, but the digital filters on the II, XT and XTk are really, really good.

If I understand you, the PEK's digital through analogue filter sound is not as smooth as PPG? Because of a lack of sweeping?

Also, does the Wave/Microwave get closer to the PPG sound than the II/XT/XTk?

Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-06 by Carbon111

> If I understand you, the PEK's digital through analogue filter sound is 
> not as smooth as PPG? Because of a lack of sweeping?

Not exactly...true "wavetable" synths like the PPG, Microwave XT and 
Fizmo use a _different_kind_of_synthesis_ than the Evolver is capable of.

> Also, does the Wave/Microwave get closer to the PPG sound than the 
> II/XT/XTk?

Not in my opinion but there are those who would argue vehemently that 
that is the case ;)

I've owned a number of first generation Microwaves over the years and 
always ended up letting them go as I could always program nearly 
identical sounds from my XT (much easier too I might add - 44 knobs!). 
The *Wave* however is a different matter...I can get extremely close but 
not *quite* "there" - thats why I have a sampler (gasp!) ;)

The Evolver just sounds *different* though it can, on occasion, be 
reminiscent of a Waldorf Q in its more "digital" moods...

Very Best Regards, James
--
My Microwave XT Page:
http://www.carbon111.com/mwxt.html
My DSI Evolver Page:
http://www.carbon111.com/evolver.html

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-07 by Scott Nordlund

> > You can actually get complex waveform sweeps from the Evolver- use
> > an LFO to
> > crossfade between oscillators 3 and 4 and two sequences to change the
> > waveforms, and set the output to mono.  The triangle wave on the
> > LFO isn't
> > ideal for this so it's a bit crude.  It's not actually a sweep in
> > terms of
> > what the PPG Wave does, it's more like wavesequencing on the Korg
> > M1.  It's
> > an interesting sound though, particularly if you use different length
> > sequences.
>
>Could you post an example? If I could get really close to the PPG
>sound with one keyboard, that can also emulate a Prophet, I'm good.

I can't post anything for the moment, but it's fairly easy to program to 
just try it out.

Anyway the others are right in that the Evolver can't get the PPG's 
wavetable sweeps, but it can get another important element of the PPG's 
sound- the waveforms are very short loops, and no multisamples or 
interpolation are used, giving a very gritty sound at low frequencies.  Most 
synths/samplers can't do this because even if you play a short loop at low 
frequency- the synth will interpolate between the data points to smooth out 
the waveform- it sounds dull and muffled rather than sharp and gritty.

Re: RE: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-08 by Ben

And waldorf is back ;-)
We can perhaps expect new stuff for their flagships synths.

Ben.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carbon111" <carbon111@...>
The MicrowaveXT is an *excellent* "PPG Emulator" as well - aliasing can be 
enabled as well as a coarser table sweep for that "authentic PPG 
grunge"...plus it has the original PPG wavetables in it.


	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services pr\ufffdf\ufffdr\ufffds : v\ufffdrifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualit\ufffd en temps r\ufffdel. 
Rendez-vous sur http://fr.yahoo.com/set

RE: RE: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-08 by Tony Scharf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Ben
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:17 AM
> To: DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: RE: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave
> 
> And waldorf is back ;-)
> We can perhaps expect new stuff for their flagships synths.
> 
> Ben.

Without going to far OT here, I am really hoping for an MWIII..

Tony

Re: RE: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-08 by James Elliott

Voice expansion cards would be great - cheap way for them to make money immediately....

Ben wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
And waldorf is back ;-)
We can perhaps expect new stuff for their flagships synths.

Ben.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carbon111"
The MicrowaveXT is an *excellent* "PPG Emulator" as well - aliasing can be
enabled as well as a coarser table sweep for that "authentic PPG
grunge"...plus it has the original PPG wavetables in it.






___________________________________________________________________________
Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver directement vos services pr\ufffdf\ufffdr\ufffds : v\ufffdrifiez vos nouveaux mails, lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualit\ufffd en temps r\ufffdel.
Rendez-vous sur http://fr.yahoo.com/set

Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-16 by seventytwojazz

Great!!! Does anybody know of a Waldorf forum? A forum in German is 
okay for me too.

Ron

--- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, "Ben" <benoitruelle@...> wrote:
>
> And waldorf is back ;-)
> We can perhaps expect new stuff for their flagships synths.
> 
> Ben.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Carbon111" <carbon111@...>
> The MicrowaveXT is an *excellent* "PPG Emulator" as well - 
aliasing can be 
> enabled as well as a coarser table sweep for that "authentic PPG 
> grunge"...plus it has the original PPG wavetables in it.
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 	
> 		
> 
_____________________________________________________________________
______ 
> Faites de Yahoo! votre page d'accueil sur le web pour retrouver 
directement vos services préférés : vérifiez vos nouveaux mails, 
lancez vos recherches et suivez l'actualité en temps réel. 
> Rendez-vous sur http://fr.yahoo.com/set
>

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-17 by arrakian

I think maybe seeing Dave's return with a "Prophetic" instrument made  
them reminisce on the glory days.... :)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On May 16, 2006, at 11:11 AM, seventytwojazz wrote:

>
> --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, "Ben" <benoitruelle@...> wrote:
> >
> > And waldorf is back ;-)
> > We can perhaps expect new stuff for their flagships synths.
> >

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-17 by William Soraparu

Prophet was a good system....Poly Evolver Keys is even greater

arrakian wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
I think maybe seeing Dave's return with a "Prophetic" instrument made
them reminisce on the glory days.... :)

On May 16, 2006, at 11:11 AM, seventytwojazz wrote:

>
> --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, "Ben" wrote:
> >
> > And waldorf is back ;-)
> > We can perhaps expect new stuff for their flagships synths.
> >

Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-17 by jontu

Hi, There s a great PPG Wave 2.v VST instrument, if you use a computer. Should find 2nd hand for cheap, until Waldorf starts selling stuff again. .jon ... Hi,

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-23 by Dan

>" I am saying that sequencing from one wave to another via the 
digital oscillators is not a smooth wavetable sweep like the PPGs and 
the Waldorfs do"

The PPGs weren't really smooth though.

Re: Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-23 by Carbon111

>>" I am saying that sequencing from one wave to another via the 
>digital oscillators is not a smooth wavetable sweep like the PPGs and 
>the Waldorfs do"
>
>The PPGs weren't really smooth though.

Yeah, but the bassline to "Windpower" wouldn't have sounded quite as nice "all smoothed out"! :)
Best Regards, James
--
http://www.carbon111.com

Re: [Evolver] PEK/MEK to PPG Wave

2006-05-24 by arrakian

"Windpower"... by Thomas Dolby? That was a PPG? Any other hits it made it on?


On May 23, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Carbon111 wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text

>The PPGs weren't really smooth though.

Yeah, but the bassline to "Windpower" wouldn't have sounded quite as nice "all smoothed out"! :)
Best Regards, James
--
http://www.carbon111.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.