--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "Keith" <keith@k...> wrote: > > Ed, > > Having never played real drums I guess "realistic" is not really what > I am after! I have been playing the TP65 as a hi-hat for a while > which seems fine, but as I now progress to using the ride a lot more > it is a bit of a shock. I guess whacking a piece of tin would be as > well :-) Realistic might not be what you're after now, but if you ever spent some time with a quality acoustic cymbal, realism might become your holy grail. The feel of the stick on a metal cymbal and the rebound, when played without undue force and at least a semblance of good technique, has a gentility and grace about it that makes the rubber pads seem positively ungainly when used as a substitute. Rubber just doesn't have the touch, regardless of how sensitive the electronics are. If hitting something to make percussive sounds is the only goal, your preference for soft rubber is as good as anyone's. If trying to duplicate an acoustic drumming experience, with similar response, approximating metal cymbals is an important part of the deal. I find the higher-end Yamaha and Roland rubber cymbals fine to play, but I much prefer either Hart's metal ride, Smartrigger's full range of metal cymbals--which I haven't tried yet but will in time--and Visu- lite's acrylics. But maybe you have to be an old geezer who played acoustic drums for 35 years to have this opinion. Ed
Message
Re: Round versus wedge cymbals
2004-12-14 by emf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.