Ed: Thanks. Your input is very helpful. Thanks for the tip on the Rolls mixer. Do you have any opinion on the Behringer Euroracks? Some of those are under $100. Wondering how they compare to the MX28. Dean --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "emf" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "deanerdrummer" <deanscott@a...> > wrote: > > > > > > I have a dtx3 with added mono pads already in outputs 9/10. I am > considering > > buying the RHH130 hihat. I want to then use the old hihat pad as a > second > > floor tom and eventually add even more pads (possibly the new round > cymbal > > pads). What is the best route for doing this since my existing > module is filled > > up? Should I purchase another dtx brain? > > > > OR > > > > It may be cheaper in the long run to just get a second dtx kit and > marry them > > together. I am considering this as well. > > > > Either way, I have gathered from reading other posts that I would > need to run > > both brains through a mixer and then to an amp. Correct? Or can the > brains > > be piggybacked off one another without the need for a mixer? > > > > How many of you use a second dtx brain? It seems in the photo > section I only > > see one brain on the kits. Yet the kits have a multitude of pads. I > am very > > much a novice on this subject and would appreciate any feedback you > can > > give me in "simple" terms. > > Hi Deaner, > > Good to have you with us. Whether you buy another module, a trigger > to MIDI interface, or a second complete kit to expand your horizons > will depend on budget and how many more pads you want in your > configuration. Check out OGD's multiple DTXtremeIIS bonanza for a > real treat; it's in the photo section. > > One thing for sure is that the DTXpress rack runs out of room really > quickly. Many people swap it out for something bigger and sturdier, > often from Gibralter, fairly early in the game, though the Yamaha > rack is expandable with some ingenuity. You can get parts from > Drumbalaya.com. It might be more cost-effective and prudent to buy, > say, a second module and a few more pads that you can integrate with > your existing kit and gradually move up as desired, required, or > financially feasible. You don't need to get another DTXpressIII for > your second module. You could get an affordable new one from another > company, or even a used one to create some variation in your sound. > An older DTXpressI or II would save you some money and probably fit > the bill for a good long while. > > Trigger-to-MIDI interfaces add inputs to modules via, as their name > suggests, MIDI. They have no sounds of their own; they take them from > the connected module. Roland's TMC-6 may be the only current model > out there, but even at a reduced price, it still costs more than many > used modules, and some of its features may be overkill with a > DTXpress. The late great discontinued TMDs, however, like the Roland > PM-16, Aphex, or the Kat MIDIkiti, if you can find one, can be > completely satisfactory, even though they are limited to mono pads. > > One way or another, Keith's magic box, which exists solely to add > inputs to a situation like yours will become available, either as a > DIY project or for sale below the cost of most, good used modules. > Stay tuned for that development if you're interested. We'll be > sending out a questionnaire to assess members' interest in it shortly. > > I can't remember what you might be seeing in our photo section to > suggest that people are magically adding pads to their DTXpress > without adding inputs. The DTXpress has an extra input that will > permit the addition of two more mono pads or one dual-zone pad. Some > people split their inputs in two, allowing them to use two pads with > the same voice and trigger settings. > > A mixer is the best way to join modules at the hip, either for common > amplification or listening via headphones. Running them together > together via MIDI is possible but a waste of the voice capabilities > of one of them. A better option would be to connect one module to the > other's auxiliary input (the mini jack, for instance, on the face of > the DTXpress) for mixing, and maybe use the other module's auxiliary > to connect a CD player. Although this option is a cheap and > relatively competent way to bide time, it is limiting in the quality > and control of the resulting sound. A mixer need not be expensive. I > keep promoting the three channel Rolls MX28, which sounds good and > costs less than $100. It will take the stereo outputs of two modules > as well as another feed (be it a CD player or another human), pan > them, and mix them together with great aplomb for either headphones > or a monitor. Of course, there are other more elaborate mixer options > from numerous companies--a portable recording device with an embedded > mixer, either analog or digital, being one of them. > > I hope this outline gives you some ideas. > > Ed
Message
Re: best way to expand?
2005-03-15 by deanerdrummer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.