> When I was choosing an amp, most people recommended Peavey, but some > recommended Behringer and I went for the latter ... in the middle of the opening song, when the > amp > failed with a smell of hot electronics and a lot of bass hum, > regardless of the settings. > ___ > Sorry... Hmmm. I've had my Behringer for about 3 years, and I've not > had a problem with it. Electronics have a habit of blowing out very > soon or not at all. That is too bad, really. I like how the amp, > despite its ported design, has a very tight damping factor that can be > felt and heard. > > Stephanie Ellison AKA Deaf Drummer > deafdrummer.org Hi Stephanie I've had the amp for a couple of years, and used it off and on for practices, so it's not an early-fault thing. And I had a previous problem with the crossover that required a repair. So, basically, in maybe two years of ownership it's failed twice, and that's with very light use. On the upside, the other two members of the band also bought the same amp model and they've not had a problem, then the local college bought some and I haven't heard problems from there either. That made me wonder whether handling a drum signal is more stressful than a normal keyboard input. Anyway, my experience is of fatal unreliability (not just, for instance, a crackling pot or similar). Maybe a Peavey amp would have given me the same probabilities. I'm interested in the damping factor thing. What do you mean by that and how does that help you .. I read about you being totally deaf in a previous post. I'm interested in online accessibility, which this has nothing to do with, but it's still interesting. Someone in a different band on the night said I should buy a .. a power cable that tidies up the voltages, power conditioner, or something. He said his colleague's guitar amp is choosy about its power source. Might there be something in that? J
Message
Re: [DTXpress] Behringer vs Peavey
2006-12-28 by john@johnallsopp.co.uk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.